Level S4 solar radiation event

(swpc.noaa.gov)

542 points | by WorldPeas 20 hours ago

44 comments

  • markonen 3 hours ago
    Just had my first uncorrectable memory read error on our servers in 10 years or so today (in Sacramento). I'd like to think it's related because the alternative (buying new DIMMs) is too horrifying to contemplate
  • jjcm 18 hours ago
    If anyone is interested in what "G4" means in context, here's the scale: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation
    • Helmut10001 12 hours ago
      Interestingly, there are about 100 events of this severity (G4) per cycle, and a single cycle lasts 11 years. This means there are about nine G4 events on average per year.
      • tomr_stargazer 10 hours ago
        Note, however, that the solar cycle [0] is so named due to its minimum and maximum: the most severe events will be clustered around the maximum, rather than spread out over the whole cycle (as your comment suggested) - so the "nine G4 events on average per year" is mathematically true but not so helpful.

        [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle

    • 8bitsrule 16 hours ago
      G4: " Induced pipeline currents affect preventive measures, HF radio propagation sporadic..."

      G5: " Pipeline currents can reach hundreds of amps, HF (high frequency) radio propagation may be impossible in many areas for one to two days..."

      • mcs5280 10 hours ago
        Sam Altman has entered an agreement to acquire all future G4 and G5 energy
      • gexla 15 hours ago
        "Cool! What's G13 do?" - Bill Hicks

        Looks like G5 is the highest level and the scale system is used by NOAA.

        • serf 7 hours ago
          >"Cool! What's G13 do?" - Bill Hicks

          I hear that bit in my head every time a new plane or weapon designation is announced, glad to hear it stuck with others too.

      • justinator 10 hours ago
        Waiting until it's like a G6, Like a G6

        Now I'm feelin' so fly like a G6

      • gosub100 15 hours ago
        "Free Energy!"
        • autoexec 11 hours ago
          That's the nice thing about solar power, but it's still a limited time offer
          • smcnally 4 hours ago
            Indirect Nuclear Fusion
        • tclancy 4 hours ago
          I wonder if they’re still putting out music …
      • dmurray 8 hours ago
        HF propagation is flaky at the best of times. It's affected by the day/night cycle and by the weather.
    • 9dev 8 hours ago
      The scale seems capped at a pretty low upper end? It feels like with all the mindbogglingly huge numbers usually involved when talking about space, there must be much, much worse events possible. Is it just that we don't know enough about them due to lack of experience that these aren't included?
    • irthomasthomas 16 hours ago
      We are at kp 8.67. The Carrington event was a kp 9
      • ianruh 16 hours ago
        I am not an expert, but it’s worth noting that the kp index has a maximum value of 9. So though the Carrington event had a kp of 9, its intensity on the related (but not capped) HP30/HP60 scale [1] would likely have been higher. [1] https://kp.gfz.de/en/hp30-hp60
        • repeekad 16 hours ago
          Queue Chernobyl documentary clip measuring the radiation as low because that’s as high the meter went
          • wyldfire 14 hours ago
            s/queue/cue/

            Though I suppose you could also queue it.

            • repeekad 9 hours ago
              Meant the first and people should do the second, Chernobyl on HBO is great.

              It’s also technically not a documentary but historical drama.

          • celsoazevedo 15 hours ago
            3.6 roentgen. Not great, not terrible!
      • kelseydh 11 hours ago
        Disturbance storm time index (DST) is a better measure of peak intensity as KP is just a weighted average of the intensity from the last three hours across monitoring stations.

        The May 2024 G5 electrical storm had a peak measured DST of −412 nT: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_2024_solar_storms

        The Carrington Event had an estimated peak DST of −800 nT to −1750 nT, but no one really knows: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrington_Event

      • keepamovin 13 hours ago
        This is also related to weaker solar events leading to stronger Earth storms due to Earth's weakening magnetic field.
      • echelon 15 hours ago
        Have we been having these more recently?

        I don't ever recall seeing these in the news so frequently. It feels like there are several a year now. A decade ago, never.

        And I also never remember seeing Aurora at my latitudes.

        Do we just have better sensing now, or is there some cycle on a period longer than a few years? Or maybe I'm crazy and just never noticed.

        • 0manrho 12 hours ago
          Mid to late 2025 was the peak of an 11 year solar cycle (25th one since we've started keeping track). We're on the trailing end of that peak activity now, which is why the past year/several months has seemed so active compared to recent years past, and should decrease significantly (in frequency and intensity) as 2026 progresses.

          There was also a fairly significant geomagnetic storm back in November of 2025 as well.

          You can see the data here at NOAA's Space Weather site https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression

        • ErroneousBosh 3 hours ago
          > Have we been having these more recently?

          Yes, for suitable values of "recently".

          > And I also never remember seeing Aurora at my latitudes.

          How old are you?

          If you're younger than say your mid-40s you probably won't remember the early 80s, which is the last time we had a solar maximum that really came to anything.

          Solar activity rises and falls on an 11-year cycle, and right now we're experiencing quite a peak. The previous three, peaking in 2014, 2011, and 1989 were a bit of a bust.

          There was a massive peak in 1979 and I can remember my dad showing me the aurora when I was about six or seven - it seemed to be present most nights over the winter. That was also around the time of the CB Radio craze, where atmospheric conditions were such that you could use "skip" - bouncing radio signals off the highly-charged ionosphere - to talk to people hundreds of miles away as if they were just down the road, even on the comparatively high frequencies that CB used. There was a bit of a peak in the late 80s, and some good RF propagation too, as well as some incredible aurora - although the big one I remember was in about the end of 1991, early 1992.

          We had absolutely blistering hot summers followed by really cold and snowy winters, too, kind of like we're having at the moment.

          If the solar cycles have a longer repeating cycle of intensity on the scale of a hundred years or so (and it looks a bit like they do) then the next solar maximum in about 2036 is going to be even bigger.

        • awesome_dude 15 hours ago
          We've just passed the 11 year peak - the sun spot activity has a period of around 11 years.
    • xeckr 17 hours ago
      Looks like we get these for about 60 days for periods lasting 11 years.
    • non- 15 hours ago
      > Biological: Unavoidable radiation hazard to astronauts on EVA; passengers and crew in high-flying aircraft at high latitudes may be exposed to radiation risk.

      Anyone have a sense of magnitude for this advisory? How much more radiation should an airline passenger expect to receive during a G4 event than normal?

      • inatreecrown2 15 hours ago
        roughly up to 5-10 times the normal dose.
        • NeoInHacker 12 hours ago
          sounds "it's okey" ?
          • jojobas 11 hours ago
            Nowhere near lifetime occupational dose limits.
    • velocity3230 9 hours ago
      This was an S4 event, however.
      • velocity3230 9 hours ago
        Belay that. The G-value was high too.
    • neonmagenta 16 hours ago
      so more of a 'bad storm here and there' level?
  • bartman 18 hours ago
    We had intense aurora in Berlin, Germany. Green clouds dancing in the sky levels. Started around 22:10 local time or a bit earlier, and at this point there's only a faint red/green glow remaining.
    • rob74 17 hours ago
      Yeah, there were auroras even as far south as Munich. Maybe not as intense, but it's the first aurora I ever saw, so I can't really judge...
      • ccozan 16 hours ago
        I am south-west of Munich and with a perfect clear sky I could only see stars, one meteor, and that's it.
        • Kyro38 34 minutes ago
          We also had them in Grenoble, south of France.
    • madduci 11 hours ago
      Can confirm, I've seen pink/green glow over Berlin Sky (and pictures as well)
    • fluxflexer 16 hours ago
      Just spend an hour outsite (Northern Germany, 01:00 MET). Unfortunately nothing to report, neither visual nor on camera. Maybe I just went to late and missed the show. I hope you habe more luck in Canada and the US!
      • madduci 11 hours ago
        I'm Berlin was around 22-23 o'clock visible
      • jacquesm 16 hours ago
        It's pretty subtle right now here in NL but I can still see it with the naked eye. Mostly greenish haze that fades in and out.
        • CalRobert 12 hours ago
          ahh I just went outside (south of Utrecht) and saw nothing. Maybe too much light pollution.
          • jacquesm 6 hours ago
            I'm lucky in that I was close to the IJsselmeer.
    • karim79 16 hours ago
      I was just out at a dog park and saw nothing! We have clear skies. I can't believe I missed this.
    • paulmist 17 hours ago
      Also seen in the Netherlands!
    • Tachyooon 17 hours ago
      Could you see it from the inner city or only closer to the edges?
      • bartman 16 hours ago
        Friends who live in Kreuzberg and Friedrichshain could see it pretty well. I'm a bit further south within Berlin where skies are minimally darker, but between 10pm and 11pm it was so bright that light pollution didn't matter.

        Funnily enough, despite having lots of alerts set up it was my mom who texted me from northern Brandenburg as she spotted it after getting an alert from RegenRadar, of all apps...

        • Tachyooon 14 hours ago
          It's amazing to hear it's visible in such a big city. I don't have a good intuition for all the metrics that describe how strong this storm was/is, but when put like this it hits home.

          Nice to hear earth weather apps also work great in space haha. I'll keep that in mind when I set up my own notifications. Hopefully I have time to look into it before the next storm hits.

        • thrawn0r 9 hours ago
          Saw it in Fhain as well over Ostkreuz station
    • TacticalCoder 13 hours ago
      I tought I was seeing aurora borealis here at 4 am local time in the neighboring Grand Duchy of Luxemburg but it was just visual pollution due to lights from a city.
    • marc_g 10 hours ago
      Oh really? Oh no I missed it! Is it going to happen again today?
  • miduil 18 hours ago
    Nice, you can already see some solar flares in Austria again.

    https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/kleinfleisskees/

    https://www.foto-webcam.eu/

  • jesprenj 4 hours ago
    Our network router in our radio station started acting crazy at 22:00:40 Europe/Ljubljana time. Uptime monitoring via HTTPS reported downtime for 5 minutes, but our radio archive that records audio over LiveWire recorded some bitcrushing effects for 5 minues. Maybe our Mikrotik hEX was flipping some bits? Recording from the radio archive: https://splet.4a.si./dir/solar.mp3
    • motrm 3 hours ago
      Sounds like a dialup modem at about 3:30 :)

      How sure are we the aliens aren't trying to dial in?

    • justsomehnguy 4 hours ago
      Yes, sounds similar to a corrupted digital audio.

      Replace hex with something more robust, at least with an actual metallic case.

      • noumenon1111 18 minutes ago
        *Gemini Tech Tip #624:* Boost your Wi‑Fi and spiritual resilience by wrapping your router in aluminum foil! Protect against solar flares, reptilian packet theft, and basic physics. Turn it into a family craft: make and decorate foil router cozies and matching foil hats, then browse Reddit and/or the park, seeking fellow shiny‑headed believers.
      • jesprenj 2 hours ago
        Yes, that is planned. As soon as we get more money (:
  • frzen 17 hours ago
    I had the most intensely coloured lights visible in the west of Ireland. I've seen them a few times before but never like this. Phones were capturing them in video not just long exposures.

    Not sure what the best service is to be alerted ahead of time. Apparently it'll be strong here again at 6am according to some of the apps some random people were waving around.

    • ortusdux 17 hours ago
      There are several apps that do a good job of alerting users. I use "Aurora Pro", which I prefer because it checks cloud cover and lets you set alert thresholds based on viewing probability.
      • King-Aaron 16 hours ago
        I woke up to a notification from aurora pro today, I'd forgotten I had the app. This would explain it
  • notfish 53 minutes ago
    Had to stay up until 2am shutting down our spacecraft. Stupid sun hates to see me get a solid night’s sleep.
  • markus_zhang 3 hours ago
    Well I didn't see anything last night (In Eastern Canada), probably because there was too much light in the suburb. Now the aurora "area" turns back to Europe and Asia, I hope you guys enjoy it!

    Judging by this picture: https://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/animations/ovation/nor... , I think in a few hours the whole North Europe can see it very clearly.

    • T0Bi 1 hour ago
      Your URL is broken (for me)
  • andrewinardeer 15 hours ago
    Any tips on best practices in how one can protect homelab rigs from a Carrington level event? Let's say we were given two days notice that the mother of all S4s was inbound. Just switch everything off?

    What if one of my homelabs needed 100% uptime to meet my wife's SLA for messaging? Is this able to be protected?

    • amluto 14 hours ago
      Not much? As I understand it, the major effects are in very long wires. Long wires can have get massive induced currents. But your homelab is unlikely to have long wires or very large loops. Ethernet wires are limited to 100m, and unshielded Ethernet is transformer-isolated to well over 1kV.

      Shielded Ethernet could plausibly have issues with induced current on the shield. PoE might be less immune than ordinary Ethernet depending on what you’re doing with it, although well-behaved devices should be isolated. If you have a cable ISP, the cable shield might get toasty, although it’s likely to be grounded close enough to your house that any damage will be upstream.

      Your 100% uptime will be tricky if your ISP goes down or you lose power.

    • rootusrootus 14 hours ago
      AFAIK the risk is for long transmission lines. So your equipment at home is not really in any danger, as long as there is not a major surge on the transmission lines that makes it all the way to your house. If that happens, well, losing the home lab is probably no longer the issue.
    • idatum 14 hours ago
      Discontinue use of your telegraph system.

      Perhaps though you will still be able to continue to send and receive messages despite having disconnected your power supply. [1]

      [1] https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uva.x001679510&seq=40...

    • tbrownaw 13 hours ago
      Make sure you have a surge protector or ups, in case it makes the power grid go funky. Which you should have anyway.

      Also, it could be a convenient excuse to upgrade to fiber internet service if you haven't already. (Yes, excuse. Equipment should have more than good enough isolation to not care.)

      • johncolanduoni 10 hours ago
        Even if you don't have fiber all the way into your house, most cable internet terminates pretty close to the home these days. It kind of has to, since bandwidth has gone way up and as a result they can't put very many subscribers on the same termination system.

        We didn't really understand this kind of thing when the Carrington event happened, so nobody knows for sure, but estimates for induced voltage on long conductors are usually something on the order of 20V/km. So for a 5 km long coaxial cable, you're only talking about ~120V of induced potential difference (i.e. the same voltage as a residential plug in the US). When people are analyzing the potential damage from this kind of electromagnetic disturbance (E3 is the term you'll see, based on analysis of nuclear EMP which has other components that you don't see in geomagnetic storms regardless of severity), it's mostly about really long conductors, like on the order of 100km.

  • Animats 17 hours ago
    PJM had some geomagnetic disturbance warnings, but did not progress to the alert stage or grid re-configuation actions. So, no US power grid problems.

        104955 Warning Geomagnetic Disturbance Warning 01.19.2026 14:30 
        PJM-RTO
        A Geomagnetic Disturbance Warning has been issued for
        14:30 on 01.19.2026 through 16:00 on 01.19.2026 .
        A GMD warning of K8 or greater is in effect for this period. 
        End time: 01.19.2026 16:00 
    
    (All times are prevailing Eastern US time)

    I've posted on this before, for other warnings. Not going to repeat that.

  • lukan 9 hours ago
    I missed it (seeing the Aurora) .. are there any reliable alerts for this sort of event, that do not alert me about anything else, but really only such big events?
    • albertzeyer 36 minutes ago
      I had registered for alerts on https://aurorasaurus.org/. But that alert was sent way too late for me (strongest lights were yesterday around 10-11 PM, and the notification was sent 2 AM today). But I was very lucky and just noticed the lights by accident on my way home.
    • MrGilbert 6 hours ago
      One caveat is, that these events cannot be forecasted in the same way as weather on earth can. You usually only have a lead time of 15 - 45 minutes. See also https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/aurora-tutorial
      • lukan 6 hours ago
        Sure. But if I am awake, those 15 minutes are enough to get dressed and go outside.

        Yesterday I just would have had to walk to the balkony to see it, but I was busy with some frustrating coding problem instead ..

        • Levitating 4 hours ago
          same, I was awake for the whole night but completely missed it
    • vachina 4 hours ago
      On iOS there’s an app literally called “Aurora”.

      It will notify you when you’re in an area with a high Kp (or above a Kp you specify).

    • cvt7bm 9 hours ago
      • lukan 8 hours ago
        Thanks, that seems exactly what I was looking for. (Now I have to figure out the best way to get a alert to my phone if my inbox receives such a mail, probably easiest to use a a mailadress just for this case and then treat this emailadress different)
  • drmpeg 16 hours ago
    Although everyone is interested in visible aurora, the proton flux is also really impressive. It peaked at 37,000 pfu at 1910Z. The highest ever recorded was 43,500 pfu in March 1991.
  • rediguanayum 17 hours ago
    Moon should be good too to see Aurora tonight: waxing crescent 1% https://www.moongiant.com/phase/today/
  • bashtoni 17 hours ago
    Australian Bureau of Meteorology advisory for visible aurora: https://www.sws.bom.gov.au/Aurora
    • jp0d 17 hours ago
      Are there any resources to track Aurora sightings or predicted sightings?
      • lakid 14 hours ago
        https://aurora-alerts.uk/ Ignore the UK TLD, this tracks global sightings
      • stubish 17 hours ago
        At the bottom right of that page is a subscribe link, with a number of different alerts and lists to subscribe to.
    • aussieguy1234 16 hours ago
      Worth noting that Kp, which many talk about in discussions online, is more or less useless for anyone in Australia or the southern hemisphere. Lots of beginner Aurora chasers here get tripped up by that.

      What is useful is KAus and the G index, KAus is shown on this page, so thats what i'll be tracking.

    • hahahahhaah 17 hours ago
      Is that tonight or last night?
      • bashtoni 16 hours ago
        It was only issued this morning Australian time, so I presume it's for tonight.
  • dschuessler 18 hours ago
    This page looks like an accessibility nightmare. The entire warning text is an image. There is no transcription present for screen reader users. I did not expect this from a government website.
  • Kunsang 15 hours ago
    • fnands 8 hours ago
      Damn, I love finding some hyper-specific forums like this one.

      Sooo much jargon.

    • neogodless 14 hours ago
      This is definitely not a language I speak!

      Flux and bZ!

      • imp0cat 5 hours ago
        Surely you must be familiar with the flux capacitor? ;)
  • PlatoIsADisease 17 hours ago
    Years ago I was concerned about this and made a plan with my wife for what to do if she was at work.

    But now we have a bunch of kids in different schools and haven't updated our plan.

    Does anyone have a plan for what happens if we have a really bad event?

    • hnuser123456 17 hours ago
      A really bad event would be that long-distance transmission lines act like antennas and pick up millions of volts and blow up all the transformers.

      I don't know how much you can plan for that other than "if it happens, try to get home", and then all the usual prepper stuff.

    • myself248 16 hours ago
      Pray for clear skies and go out and watch the beautiful aurora, silly!

      Depending on the kids' ages, you can teach them quite a lot about the Earth's magnetic field and why the aurora concentrates at the poles, how the high-energy particles light up the sky (it's a lot like a neon light), and how the atmosphere shields us from any danger despite the spectacular show.

    • internet_points 8 hours ago
      Disconnect your telegraph batteries and run on aurora power only
    • rootusrootus 17 hours ago
      For a really bad event that managed to blow a lot of transformers (presumably due to grid operators not seeing it coming) ... well, take up farming.
    • esskay 8 hours ago
      Feel a bit sensationalistic. It happens, it's not rare, and we've always got on with life perfectly fine.
    • Tepix 17 hours ago
      Buy a bit of extra food and water.
      • y1n0 17 hours ago
        And toilet paper! Rolls and rolls of toilet paper!
    • fuzzer371 17 hours ago
      Keep a couple days water and food on hand, go up to the pub, have a pint, and wait for this all to blow over.
      • JoshTriplett 17 hours ago
        With how much modern cars rely on electronics, I would not try to drive during such an event.
        • whyleyc 16 hours ago
          It’s ok - The Winchester is within walking distance.
          • jrgd 16 hours ago
            Omg i watched this yesterday!
        • lxgr 17 hours ago
          Solar flares are only dangerous to very long conductors.
        • throwaway81523 16 hours ago
          That's a safety feature. It prevents you from drinking and driving if you go to a pub during a solar flare. :)
        • jrgd 16 hours ago
          No one would drive to the pub anyway. Better walking back home…
          • JoshTriplett 15 hours ago
            Valid. I think I have such an ingrained different set of assumptions (a pub being just another kind of place for food, and "going to" anything involving a form of transportation) that that didn't even occur to me.
    • swader999 17 hours ago
      First rule of fight club...
  • WhitneyLand 17 hours ago
    How rare is this?

    G4 storms are ~100 per solar cycle (~11 years).

    So roughly 9 G4 events/year on average.

    • tbrownaw 14 hours ago
      But they should mostly be in the same part of the cycle rather than spread evenly.

      It probably wouldn't make sense to calculate "average snow days per month" across an entire calendar year (in most places...), this is the same thing.

    • rapht 5 hours ago
      This is an S4. Last S4 event was in October 2003.
    • velocity3230 9 hours ago
      This is an S4, though.
      • velocity3230 9 hours ago
        Belay that. The G-value was high too.
    • burnt-resistor 16 hours ago
      Like 20-25 years rare according to some space weather youtuber.
      • creatonez 12 hours ago
        > some space weather youtuber

        Please stop watching that guy, he is a total fraud and knows nothing about physics.

  • jokull 5 hours ago
    As seen from my apartment in Reykjavík Iceland: https://ss.solberg.is/89N0qS7T
    • smcnally 3 hours ago
      That’s beautiful. But you get aurora even sans G4, true? Was this more intense and spectacular?
  • mrbluecoat 2 hours ago
    Verizon will probably retroactively blame their outage on it.
  • lgats 15 hours ago
  • nbf_1995 15 hours ago
    Title says "S4" solar radiation event, but the linked page says "G4" geomagnetic storm
  • ComputerGuru 18 hours ago
    Do you need long exposure to make it visible with a camera? How does that work in the presence of light pollution?
    • thebruce87m 17 hours ago
      Tonight I could see the colours without the camera but it definitely stands out more with the long exposure of the camera.

      Even with lights in the direct line of the shot you you can get good results - presumably the phone is doing HDR to achieve this.

    • Macha 17 hours ago
      Local light pollution normally makes it hard to see with anything short of long exposure, but today it was naked eye visible and regular photos also captured it.
  • AnishLaddha 13 hours ago
    fascinating, hope our critical infrastructure can handle this. how long does something like this last, and will it have an effect on artemis 2?

    hypothetical: if a carrington event-esque storm happens during the mission, how badly will the houston <-> orion module communication links be affected?

  • juliend2 2 hours ago
    Might be a coincidence but for the first time last night, my son's sleep projector[0] didn't stop after 1h like it does normally.

    I guess this could be related to it? (we are in Montreal)

    I doubt these toys are protected from those kinds of events.

    [0] https://www.amazon.com/Fisher-Price-Settle-Sleep-Projection-...

  • _carbyau_ 17 hours ago
    Weirdly, while the site in question is "blaring klaxons!" there are more "cool night lights!" posts than concern.
    • zamadatix 17 hours ago
      Unless you're in space, a large scale electrical operator, or relying on HF radio there isn't much reason to be interested other than the lights for a G4 (what this is currently classed as).
      • pvab3 14 hours ago
        my Telecaster sure was noisy this morning but I didn't think much of it
    • guerrilla 17 hours ago
      > while the site in question is "blaring klaxons!"

      No, it isn't. It clearly says everything is under control but it would be good to keep an eye on it.

    • rzzzt 16 hours ago
  • JoeDaDude 16 hours ago
    There is a video update from the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center. (I could only find this on Facebook) https://www.facebook.com/reel/1190509063198524
  • aliljet 17 hours ago
    I wonder if we're going to see an aurora over Seattle tonight?
  • tigerlily 17 hours ago
    Hopefully it's clear space weather for Artemis II coming up. I wonder what they do if it's inclement en route?
    • perihelions 16 hours ago
      There's not that much they can do. It's often discussed that if the extreme August 1972 solar storm had overlapped with an Apollo mission (it didn't), it would have acutely sickened the astronauts.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_1972_solar_storms#Human...

      > "Had a mission been taking place during August, those inside the Apollo command module would have been shielded from 90% of the incoming radiation. However, this reduced dose could still have caused acute radiation sickness if the astronauts were located outside the protective magnetic field of Earth, which was the case for much of a lunar mission. An astronaut engaged in EVA in orbit or on a moonwalk could have experienced severe radiation poisoning, or even absorbed a potentially lethal dose."

      The Orion capsule's contingency plan looks something like this:

      > "To protect themselves, astronauts will position themselves in the central part of the crew module largely reserved for storing items they’ll need during flight and create a shelter using the stowage bags on board. The method protects the crew by increasing mass directly surrounding them, and therefore making a denser environment that solar particles would have to travel through, while not adding mass to the crew module itself."

      https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis/orion/scientists-and-e...

      • xattt 10 hours ago
        For All Mankind “illustrated” a solar storm at surface-level of the moon, including “boiling” regolith. I wonder how embellished this was, or whether particle bombardment would actually cause this.

        My mind goes to the working mechanism of eidophor projectors, where oil on the projection bowl does indeed deform under electron beam exposure.

  • aussieguy1234 17 hours ago
    I'll be going out tonight if this continues into Australian night time hours.

    At this strength, I could see the full display including colors with my naked eye in Melbourne, May 11th 2024. This storm is slightly stronger than that event.

    • ikr678 9 hours ago
      I'll be attempting to get some photos/footage from Esperance.
      • defrost 8 hours ago
        There's a high triple threat bar for Astro photos sourced from Western Australia.

        https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110529.html

        If you manage to pull off the Aurora Australis above a triple curl at The Right with a shark body surfing into the green room ... the internet will explode.

  • uticus 19 hours ago
    Possible aurora visible through central US tonight
  • zahlman 18 hours ago
    It seems that the peak was several hours ago, and I haven't observed any effects from it...
    • guerrilla 17 hours ago
      The peak was originally supposed to be 6-7 hours from now... it's still showing KP 8 here though, so I'm not sure what's going on. It could get more intense.
  • cess11 9 hours ago
    I live somewhat close to the arctic circle and the aurora has been exceptional lately. One recent evening it looked like there was a massive city behind the cloud cover, and a few nights before when the sky was clear I watched enormous green flames for hours.
  • ferguess_k 17 hours ago
    Darn Montreal is still too south. Wish I were in Winnipeg.
  • brador 6 hours ago
    What strength would destroy the sensor?
  • anon115 15 hours ago
    any effects on the human body??
    • internet_points 8 hours ago
      Depends. If you're outside at night and tilt your head up, the Default Mode Network of your brain may be temporarily suppressed, while dopamine may increase.
  • tramtrist 17 hours ago
    We never get aurora in Japan :(
  • cbeach 17 hours ago
    Probably a stupid question, but should I unplug my EV? (UK)
    • qayxc 16 hours ago
      No need. Wrong type of solar event. You might be able to see auroras, though. I saw some a couple of hours ago.
    • _blk 13 hours ago
      Yes! Absolutely, but only if you want to drive it.
    • jacquesm 16 hours ago
      No.
  • _blk 13 hours ago
    Nice. And it's somewhat relieving to read this over a Starlink connection.
  • burnt-resistor 16 hours ago
    Up to G-5 possibly. Cell phone visible in dark areas throughout most of CONUS.

    It was mentioned that air travel ionizing radiation exposure increases during geomagnetic storms. I'd consider pausing travel for a couple of days to not be a guinea pig because there's not enough data to consider it safe. If anyone absolutely must fly tonight, it'd be interesting if they were to take a high sensitivity dosimeter to see what happens.

    • garbagewoman 8 hours ago
      Not sure how to deal with this kind of wildly unbalanced risk assessment
  • sparin9 12 hours ago
    TL;DR: A severe (G4-level) geomagnetic storm hit Earth on January 19, 2026 due to a solar coronal mass ejection. It can disrupt power grids, GPS, satellite systems, and radio communications, while creating visible aurora displays at higher latitudes.
  • hindustanuday 5 hours ago
    [dead]
  • yzydserd 18 hours ago
    [flagged]