RealPage rent-pricing case wraps with nearly $360M to renters

(multifamilydive.com)

69 points | by raybb 5 hours ago

7 comments

  • rabidheuristics 2 hours ago
    “None of the companies admitted fault or liability. They did, however, agree to stop providing Realpage with their nonpublic data for use as an input in Realpage’s revenue management system’s price recommendations, and to stop using Realpage’s RMS in ways that use competitors’ non-public data to inform pricing recommendations”.

    Okay but Realpage has a decade of real pricing data that it can use to continue informing these rental companies and outside of them having extremely hard boundaries in their service this is just going to happen again.

    This doesn’t do a whole lot to address the actual issue, and these companies aren’t going to stop colluding over a wrist slap like this.

    • skybrian 21 minutes ago
      What about when market prices are public? Is knowing the market prices collusion?
  • epistasis 2 hours ago
    We need a public rental registry of rental prices that anybody can browse, analyze, etc. The information disparity is a problem.

    However, that's not a systematic method for lower prices. It just prevents individual cases of price gouging.

    • kdot 1 hour ago
      Al la dc rent registry, which I always thought was ironic because doesn’t this create a database where landlords can consider prices based on others… but I guess it would be public in this case.

      https://rentregistry.dc.gov/

      • Onavo 1 hour ago
        Well the point of market based interventions and government regulations like this is primarily to reduce information asymmetry. You still ultimately need to increase supply or reduce demand to move price.
    • lotsofpulp 2 hours ago
      I don’t see why rental agreements can’t be registered with the county like house sales are. It would also eliminate the need for squatter laws, as it would be trivial for police to pull up the county website and see who belongs in the home.
      • nicbou 29 minutes ago
        Berlin wants to do that to enforce rent control more effectively.
      • eru 15 minutes ago
        I think publishing your own rental contract is already legal?

        (Unless the other party to the contract deliberately asks you in the contract to keep it quiet. But that's something you need to actively agree to.)

      • zhivota 1 hour ago
        Americans are too privacy focused to accept this, but I could easily see a cottage industry of "registered agents" popping up around it who sign leases on behalf of individuals and shield them from public scrutiny.

        Alternatively we could keep the names private. A cryptographic solution would easily serve the need of authorities verifying the right person is in a place without identification, but good luck figuring out how to ensure the tenant has their keys somehow since in the US there are zero pieces of identification you can ensure every citizen has.

        • tmpz22 1 hour ago
          Are we privacy focused? Look at products like Facebook Muse, or Facebook, or Instagram, or Whatsapp, or the perv glasses, or or or
          • georgel 1 hour ago
            See RealID for how long certain states has been kicking that bucket down the road.
          • wyre 29 minutes ago
            American's seem to only care about privacy from the government, but wanting privacy from trillion dollar corporations? They keep the stock market high and provide value to their major investors and everyone's retirement accounts so obviously its fully within their rights to spy on us 24/7. /s
      • Onavo 1 hour ago
        Well, a Torrens registry systems still isn't universal yet in the US.
    • ihsw 1 hour ago
      [dead]
  • mmooss 53 minutes ago
    I wonder what empirical and theoretical substance there is to the idea that the cost of living is due to lack of competition (in zero-to-one markets), and that competition is the solution to much of this.

    On that basis, the 'free market' should be called the 'free, competitive market' - without competition, it has little value. Businesses should be required to compete and to opeerate in competitive markets. Anything anti-competitive should be treated harshly.

    • dsr_ 44 minutes ago
      Even without outright collusion, a market without at least seven viable suppliers is not really competitive. Current "monopoly" policy is corrupt.

      (Seven has been experimentally determined, but I can't recall where.)

      • gavmor 14 minutes ago
        [flagged]
  • exabrial 2 hours ago
    _thats it_ ???
    • georgel 2 hours ago
      I filed my claim, and based on their calculator this might be the most serious check from a class action (assuming I get the full amount). For me its ~1.5k between 3 named landlords.
      • jadenPete 1 hour ago
        Where is this calculator?
        • georgel 1 hour ago
          There is no calculator per se, in the settlement they explain the formula for payouts.
  • aetherspawn 56 minutes ago
    Yep sue propertyme next
  • throwitaway222 2 hours ago
    I've been saying this for a while, but there is a cottage industry like RealPage in pretty much every industry. These companies need to be slammed out of existence for anti-competitive pricing and collusion. So much corruption. I'm so sick of fraud and corruption.
    • crazygringo 18 minutes ago
      I really can't think of any others. Which is why RealPage has been so newsworthy.

      If you have examples of such a company in other industries, please share.

    • mmooss 57 minutes ago
      Could you give us other examples?
  • jmyeet 1 hour ago
    It's both funny and sad to see the mental gymnastics of people trying to find solutions to this when the solution is real simple: it's public ownership.

    Housing needs to be decommodified. It needs to stop being a retirement plan. We need to stop letting people hoard it. We need to stop subsidizing exurbs and making it illegal to build the kind of walkable communities people actually like. Case in point: Red Vienna [1].

    As another commenter noted, this is in every industry. Utilities are a particularly bad one including telcos. All the best ISPs in the US are municipally owned. Chattanooga was the first really big poster child for this.

    Privatization of all these things is just rent-seeking behavior.

    So many of society's problems come down to housing being too expensive. Anything that makes it expensive needs to be stamped out and that includes RealPage as well as Airbnb/VRBO.

    [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41VJudBdYXY&t=191s

    • dsr_ 42 minutes ago
      ... and the term for this behavior gives it away: "rent-seeking".
    • altairprime 41 minutes ago
      Which major metropolitan city in America is building half a dozen or more entire apartment buildings in its downtown inner and outer rings, specifically to implement what you’re describing?

      Hint: it has an international airport :)

      Your comment is so outrage-focused that I’m not inclined to help you make your argument. I largely agree with your point, but dialing back the rhetorical pathos would make it more persuasive.