6 comments

  • alexey-salmin 5 minutes ago
    > The ‘colony’ has evidently produced no offspring, which is due to low (though relatively stable) temperatures and scanty food in the bunker.

    Isn't it due to the lack of the queen? Colony of worker ants is a dead end

    • donkey_brains 1 minute ago
      They mentioned that a queen or brood ant might fall into the bunker occasionally but the low temperatures would prevent breeding in that case.
  • ralfd 51 minutes ago
    Needless sensationalism: I didnt find the term “cannibalistic” on the source page.
  • varjag 1 hour ago
    A unique accumulation of workers (‘colony’) of the wood ant Formica polyctena Först., trapped within an old bunker for storing nuclear weapons, is described. The source of the ‘colony’ is a large colony nesting outdoors, on top of the bunker. Individuals that have fallen down through a ventilation pipe are not able to find their way back to the mother nest.

    The dictatorship of proletariat but for ants, and inside a Soviet bunker of course. Sometimes I see why people find the idea that there's no God incredulous.

    • quibono 58 minutes ago
      > Two underground two-level ammunition bunkers, 300 metres apart (26 m × 42 m each), which constituted the core of the base and where nuclear weapons were kept, have survived (Sadowski 2011, Rutko 2015).

      Interestingly this is a "Soviet" bunker in western Poland. A Warsaw Pact bunker?

      Also, I didn't think that Soviet policy was to store nuclear weapons in Poland - not sure if this quote is accurate or if this was just more common than I had thought?

      • m4rtink 51 minutes ago
        It was likely similar to the warhead storage bunkers in Czech Republic (or Czechoslovaki back then), most likely intended for tactical nuclear weapons, like Scuds or maybe for aircraft as well:

        https://www.expats.cz/czech-news/article/top-secret-cold-war...

        https://www.rferl.org/a/24993733.html

        https://www.euronews.com/2021/07/18/czech-cold-war-depot-for...

        Of course the Soviets (who were exclusively running and guarding those bunkers back then) never confirmed what they were used to or if they contained live nuclear weapons. But it is clear that this was the intended use case, given the storage conditions, the expens to build & run those as well as how heavily they were guarded.

        • quibono 31 minutes ago
          I find these bunkers fascinating. I've always wanted to explore one.

          Amazing how much money was wasted on these only to be staffed for years and then abandoned.

          • t-3 12 minutes ago
            Successful military spending always appears to be "wasted" if you think the point is to use weapons. War means that your defense strategy has failed, peace means that it has succeeded. Never having to use what was stored in those bunkers means that they served their purpose.
    • tristramb 13 minutes ago
      Ant expert E.O.Wilson once said of communism: "Great idea. Wrong species"
  • nickdothutton 6 minutes ago
    [narrator] This was not a story about ants.
    • donkey_brains 2 minutes ago
      It’s definitely a metaphor for something, but I don’t know what.
  • neuroticnews25 45 minutes ago
    Flat parts of the earthen mound and the floor of the adjacent spaces were carpeted with bodies of dead ants. Locally the deposits were a few centimetres thick. (...) the number of dead Formica polyctena workers probably amounted to about two million. The cemeteries comprised also remnants of other insects, most probably those caught by foragers of the free-living upper colony that had fallen down. Of other ants, only a head of the Leptothorax sp. worker was found.

    "Ah yes, that small speck of chitin among 2 million other corpses is obviously a head of the Leptothorax sp. worker."

    • ForHackernews 31 minutes ago
      Presumably entomologists are good at accurately identifying small bits of ants.