Surviving "The Graduate"

(newyorker.com)

30 points | by samizdis 3 hours ago

6 comments

  • WalterBright 2 minutes ago
    Maybe the move was successful because we could relate to Hoffman, while Redford (probably the handsomest actor ever) being rejected was not relatable.
  • js2 1 hour ago
    For anyone not familiar with "The Graduate" or wants a refreshed, this analysis by Steven Benedict is as good as anyway:

    https://www.stevenbenedict.ie/2012/12/the-graduate/

    (9 minute audio essay.)

  • djeastm 18 minutes ago
    I remember watching and discussing this film in a film appreciation class. Neat to hear Hoffman's side of it (though it sounds like it wasn't a good time).
  • btilly 22 minutes ago
    Here is my hot take. His belief that he was failing, helped him succeed.

    I don't mean this in a trite way. The character portrayed is supposed to be awkward and anxious. Feeling awkward and anxious in real life, left him in the right frame of mind when he walked on set. He looked awkward and anxious, because he actually was.

    Actually feeling what the character is supposed to be feeling, is the heart of method acting. The upside of method acting is that it creates very powerful performances. The downside of method acting is that you have to experience all of the feelings of the depicted drama.

    • kannanvijayan 6 minutes ago
      I am in no way trying to undermine your point, but I have to say as I read past that first sentence, it became impossible to not imagine Tobias Fünke's aspirational role as "Frightened Inmate Number Two" as the subject of your commentary.
  • markm248 15 minutes ago
  • loeg 47 minutes ago
    Why now? These events were 60 years ago.
    • rafram 38 minutes ago
      Excerpt from a memoir that came out recently.