The Real Kevin Bacon

(pudding.cool)

68 points | by xnx 3 days ago

12 comments

  • MattCruikshank 19 minutes ago
    Sure, but what's the Basis Set movie? If you only had one actor in a movie, and you wanted to have the most connectedness in it, you'd choose Sam Jackson right now. (The one from Pulp Fiction, not the one from Ted.)

    But what if you could have TWO actors in a movie? Would Sam Jackson (again, the one from Jurassic Park, not the lawyer) still be one of them? Or is it possible that in aggregate, there are two actors who would achieve a better connectedness than Sam Jackson (the one from The Long Kiss Goodnight, not the one who was in Veronica Mars) plus one of those actors?

    What if you could have THREE actors in a movie?

    Or what about, who is the perfect sidekick for Sam Jackson (stop asking, yes, of course I mean the one with the purple lightsaber, not the one from In Time)? Who, if you add them to a Sam Jackson (the director of S.H.I.E.L.D., not the Mean Girl) movie, gives them the most aggregate connectedness?

    Enquiring minds want to know!

    Also, who's the Kevin Bacon of Bollywood?

  • card_zero 52 minutes ago
    Somehow it's a fun fact that you can reach any other actor in four moves, but a much less fun fact that you can probably-reach any other actor in 2.6 moves. "Connectedness", huh. Though it was interesting to see that Frank Welker used to be in fourth place. Never heard of him. Or I've only heard of him, he's a voice actor. He does cartoon animals, often without lines, lots of miaowing.
  • geooff_ 13 minutes ago
    This is missing the fact that there's a temporal element to this. Over time, the corpus grows larger and larger meaning younger actors and actresses find connections easier through common ancestors.
  • dec0dedab0de 28 minutes ago
    I hope Kevin bacon takes this as a personal attack and manages to get small roles in every upcoming film that has actors he hasn’t worked with yet.
  • codingdave 14 minutes ago
    I'm not sure this presentation is complete if they don't even mention Eric Roberts: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000616/
  • kornork 52 minutes ago
    This is cool! I liked the time machine the best, and was surprised to see names I didn't recognize at the top (although I did recognize a couple faces once I looked them up).
  • gbil 29 minutes ago
    John Candy #2 in 1993! Makes his loss hit hard even after all these years.
  • harikb 41 minutes ago
    I would not have guessed Willem Dafoe up there :o
    • fusslo 2 minutes ago
      I was surprised too, then I started thinking about his filmography

      Marvel Movies, John Wick, Robert Eggers films, To Live and Die In LA, Streets of Fire, American Psycho, he was unforgettable in The Life Aquatic, Wild at Heart!

      What an incredible career; I think he spends a lot of time in Italy when he's not filming now

    • ginko 9 minutes ago
      Why not? He's been hugely active over a wide range of genres. He's the exact kind of actor I'd expect to be high up.
  • ginko 19 minutes ago
    I guess this is mainly about alive actors? Because for instance I'd expect Christopher Lee to be up there but he's not even in the list.
  • BeetleB 29 minutes ago
    Ha! I correctly guessed Samuel Jackson. Over a decade ago I read he was the number 1 actor for gross receipts of all the movies any actor had made (don't know if it's still true). I somehow felt that stat would be connected to this one.

    Would never have guessed Nicole Kidman for women, though.

  • readthenotes1 1 hour ago
    Only has 2 text blobs and a few actors? Not really worth a "tap to continue" a. If the continue doesn't have any value
    • goodcanadian 9 minutes ago
      You have to keep tapping . . . I agree that it was not obvious.
    • dec0dedab0de 27 minutes ago
      I liked the presentation, and thought it was worth it.
    • xnx 1 hour ago
      I saw 19 screens of content.
  • quickthrowman 1 hour ago
    This does not work on iOS Safari, I get stuck in a loop. I haven’t installed the latest iOS update FWIW