9 comments

  • ergonaught 1 hour ago
    This regime, as others like it, poses the constant question, “What are you going to do about it?”

    And the answer is, largely, nothing.

    It’s a shame, really.

    • Braxton1980 25 minutes ago
      Blame the people who put them in charge, voters
      • cowlevel 19 minutes ago
        Why stop there? Why did voters vote the way they did?
        • WarmWash 10 minutes ago
          Populism is historically both popular and destructive.
        • Geeek 12 minutes ago
          Because they're stupid and filled with bullshit culture-war hate fueled by rightwing media?
          • barney54 2 minutes ago
            Because Joe Biden was too old and shouldn’t have started to run for President again and because Kamala Harris was a bad candidate? Or do you mean something else? You can complain about Trump, but the people had a choice.
          • felixgallo 2 minutes ago
            You don't have to assume they're stupid, it's just that they're entirely surrounded by a bubble of increasingly protofascist craziness framed as reasonable opinion. Turn on Fox News sometime, or open Twitter.
      • estearum 17 minutes ago
        > Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude.

        - Elon Musk, June 5 2025 (https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1930667528696828120)

        Voters obviously bear ultimate responsibility, but there's a lot more going on than just "voters are responsible." If that were true, corporations and wealthy individuals would have no interest in injecting money into politics, but alas... they do.

    • elmer2 53 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • globnomulous 51 minutes ago
        Could you give an example?
        • zenbane 39 minutes ago
          .
          • kannanvijayan 34 minutes ago
            Oh I thought you were going to give an example of the prior "regime" telling CFTC staff to retract analysis of suspicious oil trades.

            I guess you are asserting that this other thing is equivalent to that?

          • krige 35 minutes ago
            That's 2014. Hardly "previous regime".
          • globnomulous 35 minutes ago
            This isn't the previous regime.
          • rimeice 33 minutes ago
            7 years before he was president?
  • master_crab 2 hours ago
    Forget the IRS. America can balance its budget going after and fining these illegal trades and traders. MAGA!

    (edit: /s but not about making the government some money off this corruption)

    • lesuorac 1 hour ago
      Insider traded is expected not illegal in commodity trading.

      The market is intended to support consumers and producers of the commodity and there’s no requirement for either of them to inform the market of their intentions or information prior to a trade.

      If a coffee growers knows a blight is killing their crops they can buy millions of futures before informing the market.

      • kasey_junk 1 hour ago
        The bar for insider trading is higher but it’s not missing. Governmental employees for instance have explicit laws about their behavior as insider trading in commodities.
  • helsinkiandrew 3 hours ago
  • mhh__ 1 hour ago
    These guys are all going to end up in prison at this rate. Dems are currently predicted to win next election no?
    • baggachipz 18 minutes ago
      Maybe a mid-level scapegoat or two will go to prison. Definitely not the ones at the top. God bless America
    • pm90 1 hour ago
      Depends on who actually gets elected. A centrist candidate like Buttigeg/Ossoff/Harris/Newsom would almost certainly lead to no prosecutions. Someone with actual convictions like AOC or Ro Khanna might.
      • estearum 15 minutes ago
        Ossoff does not really seem like a centrist on this point. He's pretty vicious about the whole Trump criminal organization.
      • horns4lyfe 1 hour ago
        [flagged]
        • boston_clone 39 minutes ago
          Shallow dismissals and low-effort responses are not in the spirit of this site; please try to better substantiate your ideas.
    • baq 1 hour ago
      Oh absolutely not. They’re going to end up very rich!
    • shrubble 1 hour ago
      The CFTC’s refusal to do anything useful serves both parties.
    • pjc50 53 minutes ago
      You might want to have a look at what happened to Iran-Contra. Or indeed, the current President's conviction in a New York court: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_trial_of_Donald_Trump...

      They're simply in the oligarch level now. Everyone understands that they're above the law. Nowhere near enough Democrats are talking about the level of corruption clearout that would be required to bring accountability. Law enforcement are heavily compromised in the opposite direction. See the raid on Ilhan Omar, for example.

    • specproc 59 minutes ago
      So the election will be meaningless. Expect bad things in November.
    • cowlevel 1 hour ago
      Even if they win, you're being extremely optimistic about what they'll do. Most of them are only slightly less corrupt than this, and definitely not enough to actively punish corruption. Most times they just say "let's move on" and grant some type of pardon.
      • benregenspan 43 minutes ago
        Articles like this make a pretty good case against "only slightly less corrupt than this", the difference in scale really is extreme: https://reason.com/2026/07/09/the-most-corrupt-presidency-in...
      • chii 36 minutes ago
        > Most of them are only slightly less corrupt than this

        not slightly. Just less openly.

        And given how there's no punishment for the current regime, they might start thinking they could also get away.

        Americans need to take a page out of france. Look at how they protest!

        • cowlevel 17 minutes ago
          I think the democrats are definitely less corrupt but still extremely corrupt. It's just that the current administration is so vastly, mindbogglingly corrupt it blows all previous meanings of "extremely corrupt" out of the water. It's like comparing the memory safety of C++ to the memory safety of hexadecimal machine code: Yeah C++ isn't particularly safe but when you compare it to flipping bits with tweezers and a steady hand, it's miraculous.
        • el_blargos 27 minutes ago
          Yeah but its unpay strike we're taking. Not sure a US worker can afford that.

          And... Its popular. When I go to a protest in the US I'm coming home sad.

          • cowlevel 10 minutes ago
            You are shadowbanned
      • dash2 1 hour ago
        I never saw anything remotely close to the Trump 2 level of corruption in any previous administration, Democrat or Republican.
      • ourmandave 44 minutes ago
        It really is mind boggling to watch a months long committee investigation of Jan 6th and then Merrick Garland just nopes out.
        • estearum 13 minutes ago
          I think (hope) that the next generation of Dem leadership saw the error in that and will come out guns blazing.

          If the remaining MAGA cultists want to take to the street and die for their godking then so be it. The criminals must be punished.

      • sandworm101 20 minutes ago
        >> only slightly less corrupt than this

        The values do not bare comparison. Lookup the whitewater controversy (Clintons, 1990s). The loans in that fiasco were in the low hundreds of thousands of dollars. Trump just earned over 2,400,000,000$ in one year as president. One man. One year. And only the money he felt the need to report. There is simply no meaningful comparison to any previous corruption scandals. Nothing touches the numbers 10-digit gain numbers spiraling around the current administration.

        I am not sure the old pardon system will function here. The second half of that system involved the pardoned people slipping into a quiet retirement. The Trumps are not going to go quietly.

      • llm_nerd 1 hour ago
        > Most of them are only slightly less corrupt than this, and definitely not enough to actively punish corruption.

        This feels like one of those "and that's why I blame the Democrats for everything Trump does, so I guess I have to vote for Trump's enablers" bit of horseshit, fwiw.

        Both parties are completely in the pocket of special interests (billionaires, Israel, among others), however on the corruption file the GOP has an absolute monopoly. The corruption in the modern Republican party is simply off the charts. And this presidency has turned the corruption to the max, in the open. Every criminal knows that if you think you're going to get caught, the first thing to do is profess your love of Trump and declare yourself a Republican, and in a moment your crimes will be exonerated and it will all be called "lawfare".

        > Most times they just say "let's move on" and grant a pardon.

        The Democrats have constantly tried to be the "high road" party. The law and order, let the process run out party. The "let's make bridges and not walls" party. The Republicans have completely taken advantage of it. If they take power -- which I think there is going to be a "Surprise" by this criminal fascist -- they need to go absolutely scorched Earth. And screw slow walking with some Merrick Garland type of snail, speed-run sending every Trump and enabler to jail. Hegseth needs to spend his remaining days rotting in a dungeon.

        I mean, Trump still sincerely calls Democrats "divisive". From the guy who gets his chuckling audience of halfwits to cheer on blowing up American cities, and who constantly attacks and disparages "blue states" and their residents.

        I cannot for the life of me understand how Americans in the better states aren't talking about secession. You simply must send some of the ignorant, garbage states packing.

        And seriously, the "both parties are the same" trope is so transparent now. It's a coping mechanism that terrible people use to try to justify why they're how they are.

        • Sharlin 32 minutes ago
          "Guess what, we don’t want you back in the Union after all, good riddance"
  • arn3n 1 hour ago
    The CFTC, since Trump, has become entirely corrupt. Note that the proliferation of sports gambling in prediction markets, which is explicitly illegal, largely exists because the CFTC refuses to enforce their own legal mandate against Kalshi and Polymarket.

    It’s actually worse; when states try to shut down sports betting in prediction markets, the CFTC fights on behalf of Kalshi with the reasoning that only the federal government has the mandate to regular futures and prediction markets. And then they refuse to regulate!

    The CFTC is supposed to have 5 chairs, with no more than 3 in the same party. The administration has gotten around this rule by simply removing 4 of the commissioners and then refusing to appoint replacements. In effect, the CFTC has only 1 republican chair and no opposite party representation. The level of corruption is staggering.

    • namdnay 29 minutes ago
      > sports gambling in prediction markets, which is explicitly illegal

      It’s a bit more complicated than that. The CFTC argues that under Dodd-Frank any bet on a future event that can have economic consequences is regulated by the CFTC.

      It’s a bit silly because this obviously wasn’t the intention of the legislation, and it would also mean anyone betting outside a CFTC regulated exchange is in illegality. But it’s valid enough that The case will probably go to the Supreme Court.

    • BoggleOhYeah 1 hour ago
      Not to mention that Trump Jr is an advisor to both Kalshi (YC19) and Polymarket.
  • pards 2 hours ago
  • hn3ufz62f7 2 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • jdw64 2 hours ago
    The reason America is great is that even after electing such a corrupt president twice, the country still keeps running. I feel the greatness of the American political system.
    • usui 2 hours ago
      The counterfactual doesn't make sense. Which country would stop or grind to a halt after electing a corrupt president? I think almost all countries would keep running at a basically normal capacity until failure, yet that doesn't prove those countries have great systems.

      This will need a lot more time and hindsight to make general statements in terms of the wider picture.

      • diydsp 1 hour ago
        It'a not abt whether it keeps running. It's whether its citizens are able to maintain their rights.
        • estearum 11 minutes ago
          Many citizens are not able to maintain their rights. Citizens are getting shot and killed by masked federal agents marauding through their neighborhoods. Americans who speak with particular accents or have specific skintones or frequent certain restaurants are getting harassed by police non-stop.
        • cowlevel 1 hour ago
          the comment specifically said whether it keeps running
      • mxkopy 1 hour ago
        I think it’s sarcasm. In other counties such corruption would trigger revolution, and the political system would grind to a halt
    • Steve16384 57 minutes ago
      What would be your definition of not running? It's like when someone says "We survived Covid!". Yes, you might have but thousands of others died.
      • serf 3 minutes ago
        >What would be your definition of not running?

        inflation combined with little to no wage increase leading to total economic stall outside of the scope of any safety mechanisms, which precipitates an extreme cliff-face degradation of everyday life and commerce for citizens at every level.

        or, another way : conditions that would lead to public rebellion en masse, which further stalls things past the economic strife.

        the type of thing 1780s France saw.

      • dgellow 2 minutes ago
        It’s way worse, the accumulated covid deaths in the US was above 1.1M in 2023
    • mschuster91 2 hours ago
      Eventually though, the built in resiliency will be destroyed. Public services got gutted by DOGE and a bunch more called it quits.

      And in the end, that is the game they are playing. Starve the beast (aka, the US government) until not much more than the military remains.

      • actionfromafar 30 minutes ago
        And weaken the brass, Russia style, until the military is just the personal Army of the King.
    • timnetworks 37 minutes ago
      pro-western speech is not accepted on this forum. you'll be downvoted and flagged for saying the obvious.
    • phs318u 1 hour ago
      Please tell me there's an implied /s there somewhere.
    • alienbaby 1 hour ago
      have you looked closely at the state of your institutions lately. 'The country keeps running' .. a large thing has quite a lot of momentum, it will travel quite far from that alone even if you do remove it's kneecaps.

      unless you dropped the '/s' ?

      • actionfromafar 1 hour ago
        Russia also "keeps running". The floor is a long way down, doesn't mean it's a good idea to go in that direction.
    • LeBit 1 hour ago
      The billions diverted from the government (tariffs, Venezuelian oil, etc) to enrich his own family and friends probably won’t make a dent in the American economy.

      America is so great , it can sustain the appetite of corrupt presidencies.

      • boesboes 1 hour ago
        Just don't look at how the bottom half is doing!
        • cowlevel 14 minutes ago
          I heard there's now an epidemic of people dumping their spare change jars on the gas station counter to get the last drops of gas they can. This is what a collapsed country is like. This is what the USSR was like just before it officially disintegrated. The relatively wealthy tech bubble this website inhabits is shielded from it to a large extent.