15 comments

  • zerof1l 0 minutes ago
    I have a rooted LG C4. Beyond blocking things at the DNS level, not accepting terms, not using AI, I wonder if there’s some software existing solution or documented step-by-step to remove this bloatware/spyware, given that I have root access.
  • Lio 43 minutes ago
    In an age where AI can search vast amounts of data having something in your home or workplace turning what it hears into text looks like a problem waiting to happen.

    E.g. As soon as someone proves LG, Samsung, etc. recorded and stored credit card details and knowingly have weak security this is going to be a massive business liability.

    That's an easy one to put a compensation figure on but there's probably all sorts of other exploits waiting to happen.

    I think the most egregious thing here is that if you don't give the TV a network connection that it will actively search for other ways to get the data back to LG such as open WIFI.

    • jiaosdjf 20 minutes ago
      The value of this data to the NSA, Mossad etc is probably the only thing keeping it secure.

      Never in human history has a government had the means to simultaneously spy on millions of people, to use everyday private conversations to categorise them into various threats to the state, and better yet these tech companies can still sell the commercially valuable side of this to advertisers.

      • nannal 14 minutes ago
        Advertisers are the reason we have this problem. The only way to stop them is legislation.
        • shit_game 7 minutes ago
          People could return to burning down enterprises that they find unsavory or detrimental to society, such as they did during the industrial revolution, but this is problematic in that it's violent and not something the modern person often considers as viable. A part of why people consider this unviable now is in-part due to the consequences of these surveilance technologies. It's difficult to accomplish a revolution when everyone is being spied on all the time.
    • bilekas 31 minutes ago
      > E.g. As soon as someone proves LG, Samsung, etc. recorded and stored credit card details and knowingly have weak security this is going to be a massive business liability.

      My tinfoil hat believes that they've already accounted for this as the price of doing business. They will have already budgeted for the fines that they might incur, pay them off and continue as normal while people become accustomed to it.

    • shit_game 10 minutes ago
      >this is going to be a massive business liability.

      No. this is going to go "unnoticed" or at least unactioned. These are surveilance devices - compromising their value as source of surveilance is neither in the interest of industry (who are selling and buying the surveilance) or government (who are buying and acting on it). The age of shame is over. Current world goernments have flourished under the premise of being terrible, horrible, awful, evil enterprises that do bad for the sake of either being bad or enriching the bad - a consumer device with a ToS that says it will spy on you spying on people is nothing now. Laws be damned, because laws mean nothing now. These devices bery well may soon be the only lawfully available devices in the consumer market precisely because of their surveilance capabilities. Governments are reluctanty catching up to the capabilities of digital technologies, and they're finding them more useful now than ever before. We will be burning witches again before we ever prosecute tech companies for doing bad things.

    • dgellow 16 minutes ago
      Based on historical records, I would say not much will happen to these companies. Interested to see what the EU will do though
  • HelloUsername 21 minutes ago
    Ongoing discussions:

    "216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49592375

    "LG TVs aren't the only ones spying on you [video]" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49575176

  • userbinator 6 minutes ago
  • Y-bar 1 minute ago
    notebookcheck.net:

    > We value your privacy

    Shares my browsing info with 1745 "partners" with no clear way to opt out (which ought to be opt-in by the way to be compliant with ePrivacy and GDPR).

  • trilogic 25 minutes ago
    Is all of them, every "smart tv" does it, even after adb, permission restricting or rooting. Insert a (non infected) usb lamp in your tv and see the lamp turning on when your tv is off. It notifies you about the background activation activity :) Interesting to see when exactly get active (is it keywords or nearby devices or scheduled processes)? Can´t be keywords as that would mean 24/7 active and the lamp says otherwise.
  • 8fingerlouie 29 minutes ago
    My TVs are on the IoT network so that I can control them from Home Assistant, but they're blocked from accessing the internet.

    DNS lookups are redirected or blocked (53 redirected to my local DNS resolver, 853 blocked), and DoH is blocked as best effort though it's hard to block HTTP DNS traffic, which again is why the devices are blocked in the firewall.

    All streaming is done via AppleTV, which is a platform I trust infinitely more than LG/Samsung/whatever.

  • acd 25 minutes ago
    This is the same behaviour as the german secret police in east germany. The difference now its for ads and by tech. All collected data are probably ai transcribed from audio to text and is fused via data fusion to serve ads. Add collaborative filtering to find similar interests between users.
    • polotics 24 minutes ago
      how do you know it is for ads? how do you know it will always be only for ads if it now is?
      • jiaosdjf 16 minutes ago
        Why not both?

        Mossad would love to know who to de-bank for criticising Israel, United Health Care would love to know who to deny coverage to based on remarks about their back pain.

      • sixeyes 4 minutes ago
        that's the fear, but it would be reasonable to say that ads are what has gotten us to this point
  • chimpontherun 35 minutes ago
    the only TV I have connected to the home network (guilty, I admit), Sony OLED 65, ARP floods my network about 12-15 hours after "turning off". On a plus side, it doesn't appear to be streaming anything out: no local DNS hits, not enough outgoing traffic for any meaningful audio stream

    The choice between privacy concerns and ineptly coded network stack is tough. But that's the choice we're forced to have

  • egorfine 1 hour ago
    They just won't stop, will they?
    • pluc 1 hour ago
      They will once they've killed television and they'll get back to the net.
  • gruelsandwich 37 minutes ago
    As an owner of a (2020?) LG WebOS TV, to what degree can I fight this? Any point in trying Pihole with targeted blocking of certain IPs?
    • lodovic 6 minutes ago
      At this point, best to just keep it disconnected. Just use an apple tv or similar. They sold us a spying device masqueraded as a smart TV.

      If internet is really required, I'd personally flood such an LG tv with fake data - add a raspberry pi to provide it with looped audio streams for the microphone, fake bluetooth devices, and so on. But it's still probably a drop in a bucket.

    • bilekas 30 minutes ago
      So I have a tv of LG from the same period. I keep it dumb, not connected to the internet and just use an apple TV, so far it's a clean option. And it's always a good idea to have piHole up to, they usually have the block list updated with LG's and Samsungs urls.
      • realityloop 24 minutes ago
        The Gamers Nexus video explained that they will connect to nearby open SSID’s to send the data they have collected. So just not connecting it to your network may not be enough.
      • chimpontherun 24 minutes ago
        Fun fact: some (most?) Samsung TVs of the last ~6 years can't complete OOB setup if they're connected to a PiHoled network with the most vanilla PiHole filters
    • chris_overseas 24 minutes ago
      You can (hopefully) root your TV: https://e.nya.je/getroot/ and then follow a guide like this to disable all the snooping: https://forum.level1techs.com/t/lg-tv-block-mini-how-to/2551...

      Disclaimer: I haven't tried any of this myself, I've just been looking into it as I am/was considering buying an LG TV.

    • chimpontherun 27 minutes ago
      PiHole doesn't block IPs. It blocks DNS. The device have at least three ways to bypass PiHole: use external DNS directly, or pin the phone-home servers' IP addresses, or use some other protocols to carry IP resolution.

      I'd just open the TV and yank or desolder the mic out. Or use the TV as a dumb monitor -- don't connect it to WiFi or Ethernet. And use an external Kodi/AppleTV/whatever-rocks-your-viewing-boat

      • noinsight 23 minutes ago
        > don't connect it to WiFi or Ethernet

        This is not sufficient (for some of these devices) - they will automatically connect to an unsecured hotspot.

        • chimpontherun 18 minutes ago
          well, if that was the case with my TV and/or if I was worried, I've got a soldering iron and I'm not afraid to use it
    • nicce 27 minutes ago
      I bought Apple TV many years ago and haven’t plugged tv into internet since.
  • VerifiedReports 14 minutes ago
    Clearly the penalties for this are not high enough, because the scumbags keep doing it.

    Vizio TVs were caught taking screen grabs and phoning those home years ago.

  • robin_reala 39 minutes ago
    I mean, I’m not disagreeing, but it’s a bit rich for a site that logs data to 1,745 “partners” to be complaining too much.
  • polotics 41 minutes ago
    GDPR compliance lawsuitssss in 3...
    • marcyb5st 29 minutes ago
      I really hope they do and slap them with the 4% of their total global annual turnover.
  • jiaosdjf 24 minutes ago
    [dead]