Claude: Degraded Performance for Multiple Models

(status.claude.com)

43 points | by matt89 19 minutes ago

15 comments

  • sreekanth850 1 minute ago
    Anthropic had really screwed up after 4.6. i don't know if they work to satisfy the ego of themselves or for releasing a better model for tasks.
  • swader999 5 minutes ago
    And we get our subscription usage cut in half tomorrow if I remember correctly?
    • ramoz 0 minutes ago
      Source required here
    • echelon 2 minutes ago
      Open source, here I come.
    • eamag 2 minutes ago
      by a third (it was 50% increased)
    • saaaaaam 4 minutes ago
      What?!
  • fny 0 minutes ago
    Despite the years-long moaning on HN about AWS US East being a single point of failure, we've sold our souls to yet another unstable monolith.
  • carterschonwald 8 minutes ago
    ive found degraded performance on models larger than 4.7. i assume its model damage from overly self righteous post training resulting in false/feigned balance imported into any long running complex task.

    wish i was joking.

    • kardianos 3 minutes ago
      I've switched off claude this week; the last week has been significantly degraded in ability, many more screw-ups.
    • brcmthrowaway 5 minutes ago
      Aren't the model weights frozen?
      • mceachen 0 minutes ago
        Model competence is an interaction of weights, system prompt, and harness.
    • retr0rocket 7 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • hinkley 7 minutes ago
    I wonder if they’ll ever find that someone has tricked the models into doing work off the books. If they did the incident report might look like this, especially if someone got greedy instead of keeping it small. Or screwed up.
  • gzer0 2 minutes ago
    Nooooo I'm going to have to use my brain again and write 100% of my code like a caveman from December 2024.
  • saaaaaam 4 minutes ago
    This feels like a near daily occurrence.
  • drums8787 4 minutes ago
    Our week of discontent.
  • rvz 2 minutes ago
    Claude is taking a watercooler break for now. Just like a human would.
  • gaigalas 4 minutes ago
    This age: we made the thing that codes faster before we made the thing that does QA faster.
    • __MatrixMan__ 2 minutes ago
      Nothing new here. Except for the most trivial of bugs, finding and reliably replicating the bug is almost always harder than fixing it.
  • isoprophlex 6 minutes ago
    With the Opus models spouting more and more gibberish as version numbers increase, the joke about what "degraded performance" means basically makes itself
  • bayganyo 9 minutes ago
    Here we go again...
  • bulverismo2 8 minutes ago
    ok, i am not crazy
    • ray_v 5 minutes ago
      well, I wouldn't go that far .. but in this small, narrow case ... no.
  • miroljub 10 minutes ago
    After watermarking debacle and general repeated misanthropic behaviour, I don't see a single reason to keep using their products.

    There are many alternatives, better, cheaper and more ethical. There's no way I'm going to support a family associated to Epstein with my or my company's money.

  • ajaykumarc 10 minutes ago
    [dead]