11 comments

  • zbentley 32 minutes ago
    And with $160MM in funding at a $1.1B valuation? I don't know about their debt, but to get to LEO in 8 years on that little money is extremely impressive.
    • londons_explore 3 minutes ago
      If you do all the work in India, you have low materials costs and low labour costs.
  • sidcool 35 minutes ago
    Only the third country to achieve this. Kudos.

    There's another startup trying reusable rockets.

  • ghm2199 15 minutes ago
    A small but bright light in an economy where manufacturing jobs are hard to come by (https://archive.ph/Haj8n).
  • walrus01 23 minutes ago
    The first, second and third stages all being solid rockets also means India now has a global-range ICBM, with only a little bit of modification needed to make it storable in a silo. Privately developed, but I would be astonished if the Indian military isn't well aware of this new capability.
    • nirav72 0 minutes ago
      India has had the ability to reach LEO and beyond for a while now. So bringing down a nuke anywhere on the planet wouldn't be that difficult for them. That goes for any country that has LEO launch capabilities.
    • ghm2199 20 minutes ago
      The mil have had solid propulsion for a while https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agni-VI
      • walrus01 12 minutes ago
        Right, but see the details for estimated range and the map. Not that India has any foreseeable need to nuke Argentina but it's not in range. It's entirely possible the public data is wrong and the Agni VI has a global range.

        But by definition if you can put something into a 350x350 km low earth orbit (something like 7800m/s total delta V) you could also deliver a re-entering payload from your launch site to any other spot on earth, within the limitations of the inclination you're launching to.

  • ambicapter 22 minutes ago
    4 stages feels like a lot of added complexity for your first launch. I assume it gives you more performance margin to drop weight/stages more often?
    • MobiusHorizons 8 minutes ago
      4 stages is certainly a lot more than most rockets, but most rockets don’t use solid rocket stages. Solid rocket motors are generally much more reliable/ simpler than liquid fueled stages, but they can’t be throttled or turned off early which makes it hard to achieve precise orbits. My guess is the extra stages allow for better control by carefully choosing when to light the next stage. The scout family of rockets are also 4 stage solid rockets and probably a good comparison.
    • walrus01 21 minutes ago
      It's three solid rocket boosters stacked on top of each other and a very tiny liquid fueled engine on the 4th stage. I would be interested in what the delta/v stats/capability of the 4th stage booster are with 350 kg payload.
    • wat10000 8 minutes ago
      A partially empty stage wastes mass on propellant tanks sized for the full load. The mathematical ideal would be an infinite number of infinitesimally small stages.
  • jdiez17 1 hour ago
    Extremely strong performance from India’s Skyroot with their Vikram-1 rocket. I can say that many in the space industry are looking for new launch capacity to LEO.
    • hulitu 1 hour ago
      > Extremely strong performance

      Strong ? They shall learn from SpaceX how one explodes rockets on the launch pad. /s

  • vjsrinivas 34 minutes ago
    India's space work often went under the radar. Im glad they're getting the success and attention they deserve.
  • bovermyer 1 hour ago
    That's pretty cool. The phrase "3D-printed engine" stuck out to me as neat, too.
  • ColdStream 4 days ago
    Fantastic news! Always good to see others manage achieve great things.
  • nubg 25 minutes ago
    Superpower by 2026 it seems
  • guess_who_is 36 minutes ago
    Vikram-1 is distilled version of Saturn-V
    • guess_who_is 10 minutes ago
      Judging by the downvotes, some anthropic investor dod not like the joke - as intended.
      • MobiusHorizons 3 minutes ago
        No it’s just a really insulting and irrelevant thing to say.