31 comments

  • kristopolous 1 hour ago
    Next time someone tells you this is the party of free market and small government, I guess you just laugh now?
    • GolfPopper 48 minutes ago
      I've been laughing when people tell me that for my entire adult life. It remains a pretty funny bit of dark humor, though.
    • seemaze 7 minutes ago
      Having an a collective economy governed by the “free market” is like having a pile of stones governed by gravity. There exists a primary directive force, but if you want to construct a cathedral or a bomb shelter, you need to impose some constraints, lest you revert to the angle of repose.
    • ch4s3 1 minute ago
      They haven’t claimed to be the free market party since Obama was in office. Trump very much ran an anti free market campaign the first time.
    • JPKab 2 minutes ago
      If you think that anthropic wasn't pushing aggressive regulatory capture legislation in the Biden administration, why do you think they hired a bunch of people from it?
    • Gagarin1917 28 minutes ago
      Now?
    • az226 40 minutes ago
      Not just that, Biden administration started with some AI regulation that the Trump administration nixed, and then outright banning models. Lunacy.
    • paytonjjones 33 minutes ago
      That's always been a relative, rather than absolute statement.

      Genuine question: if Democrats take power, do you expect them to be more interventionist or less interventionist with respect to AI? Bernie's jockeying leads me to suspect "more", but I could very well be wrong.

      (FWIW I personally think modern AI falls in the small realm of potentially dangerous technologies that merit careful, ideally bipartisan, government oversight)

      • brokencode 26 minutes ago
        I think they’d try to get something through Congress to regulate the industry in a rules-based way.

        The current admin flies by the seat of their pants and at least creates the perception of political decision making.

        • FireBeyond 17 minutes ago
          > the perception of political decision making

          The what? More like "the whims of an eighty year old in cognitive decline and those wishing to curry or keep his favor" - quite an expansive definition of "political decision making".

          • dualvariable 3 minutes ago
            Don't forget the blatant grift and corruption.
      • 4lx87 24 minutes ago
        We don’t have to guess. Democrats had a pragmatic policy under Biden — which was rescinded by Trump when he took office.

        https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statement...

        • andsoitis 3 minutes ago
          How well does it stand up to Mythos?
    • nutjob2 36 minutes ago
      Also free speech/the first amendment and various other rights people are supposed to have but don't in practice.
      • DANmode 11 minutes ago
        Fourth Amendment, through corporate data purchase or exfiltration.
    • paulddraper 19 minutes ago
      Then cry as you look for the free market/small government leaders.
    • bilsbie 17 minutes ago
      Which party is?
      • iAMkenough 11 minutes ago
        The one currently running the show.
    • jknoepfler 29 minutes ago
      Ever since I've been conscious (the 80s), it's been the party of fear, violence and greed. They've consistently nominated actual clowns for positions of power. B-movie actor Ronald Reagan... Dan Quayle... Sarah Palin... the current, truly stunning iteration of absolute moral and intellectual bankruptcy TWICE after he killed hundreds of thousands of people due to COVID/vaccine skepticism and staged a violent attack on the capitol after losing a democratic election.

      Free market? Small government? Big police state, trillions in defense contractor grift, unsustainable tax breaks to the wealthiest leading to massive spending deficits... all while doing everything to erode access to education, healthcare and basic services.

      It is just utterly baffling to me. I'm... well along the spectrum... so people not responding correctly to obvious information is just something I've gotten used to but just... wow.

      edit: typo

      • danans 5 minutes ago
        > It is just utterly baffling to me. I'm... well along the spectrum... so people not responding correctly to obvious information is just something I've gotten used to but just... wow.

        People get quite a kick out of seeing people they don't like get hurt. They can stay entertained by that for a long time until it bites them.

        Only now is it finally biting with the collapse of the rural medical clinics, the war induced spike in the price of gasoline, etc.

        That's probably playing a big part in the seeming shift in the electorate in every election.

    • ryanar 56 minutes ago
      its all trump, he is a megalomaniac, not affiliated with any party but his own
      • afavour 40 minutes ago
        They have affiliated themselves to him. Watch, within a month of Democrats being back in power they’ll be harping small government, denigrating the national debt they ballooned themselves. There’s no reason to help them attempt to disavow it.
      • ryanmcbride 34 minutes ago
        it's actually the entire party that's propping him up. If it was just trump he would be living on the street.
      • Klathmon 51 minutes ago
        But it's not just him, it's the entire party aggressively supporting him and everything he does.
        • atlgator 41 minutes ago
          They passed one major piece of legislation since he took office and it was loaded with pork to get everyone onboard. I wouldn't call that aggressive. The Right is very fractured right now.
          • wk_end 33 minutes ago
            At least in part that's because they've stopped legislating. The executive now basically just does whatever it wants.
          • jknoepfler 12 minutes ago
            It's fractured as a consequence of its own actions, which all of its constituent members bear direct responsibility for.

            Epstein cover up? Iran? COVID denialism? Complete disregard for rule of law? Accepting massive, direct bribes? Trying to control broadcast media?

            That's all on the Republican party as a collective, who did absolutely nothing to resist it and everything to put him in power TWICE. TWICE.

          • jLaForest 30 minutes ago
            The right is fractured is several ways but there is one unifying value: unquestioning support for Trump
      • servercobra 51 minutes ago
        And yet the rest of the party falls in behind him.
      • keyle 43 minutes ago
        It seems people can flip that coin whenever it suits them.
      • gkoberger 36 minutes ago
        Trump has an 87% approval rating amongst Republicans as of the last poll I can find.

        While Trump is a megalomanic and does whatever he wants, he has the mandate of the Republican party, whose elected officials could choose at any moment to end this by withdrawing support.

        Don't let them off the hook.

      • malcolmgreaves 41 minutes ago
        The entire Republican party in all branches of government is supporting Trump. His politics and the Republican party politics are one and the same. The last election the party did not have a platform because, quite literally, they said that whatever Trump says _is_ their platform.
      • jknoepfler 18 minutes ago
        He's a Republican backed by the Republican establishment funded by Republican donors and massively influential in Republican primaries. Republicans voted him into power twice. Republicans pushed his voter fraud narrative. Republicans embraced his vaccine skepticism and killed countless Americans. Republicans voted for his ICE policies that murdered two citizens of my home state.

        Republicans caused this disaster and are all, each and every, individually morally responsible for putting Trump in power.

        Republican voters, Republican politicians, Republican donors and the Republican political machine.

        They picked the losing side of history and they can sink with it.

    • jmyeet 20 minutes ago
      Considering there's no such thing as a "free market" I've been laughing for a real long time. Markets require regulation and enforcement to function.

      The US government was created to protect the interests of rich, white, male slave owners. And if you look at Louisiana State Penintentiary (often called "Angola"), which is essentialy a Southern plantation with forced labor, you realize not as much has changed as you might otherwise think.

      • paulddraper 16 minutes ago
        The it did a pretty shit job of it. Within 100 years it was killing hundreds of thousands to fight against that purpose.
        • mullingitover 4 minutes ago
          The point of slavery was money, and the point of money was power. By the time of the civil war the real power for the ruling class was coming from industrialization.
  • tracerbulletx 2 hours ago
    Imposing a licensing system on models for limiting domestic use should require an act of congress but I mean obviously we're well past that red line.
    • coffeemug 1 hour ago
      Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives. Even firearms, despite a constitutional amendment! Why not models? (Note I am not arguing it's a good idea; I'm making a narrow argument that there is precedent.)

      EDIT: I agree that it should require an act of Congress to explicitly delegate this power.

      • tzs 1 hour ago
        > Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives.

        Every one of those is by a regulatory agency that was explicitly empowered by Congress to do such regulation.

        • to11mtm 1 hour ago
          until it isn't, i.e. certain rulings over the last couple years...
          • morkalork 1 minute ago
            You're talking about the EPA yes? Such ridiculousness
      • sigmar 1 hour ago
        The ATF was created by an act of congress. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968
      • standardUser 1 hour ago
        All of the agencies responsible for those regulations were created by and get their funding from Congress. Currently, they're asleep at the wheel. Or a better idiom might be "cowering in the corner".
        • GolfPopper 47 minutes ago
          I would say, "sitting smugly astride the monster's back, confident that they will never be fed to it".
      • UncleEntity 1 hour ago
        Fairly certain all those have "acts of congress" attached to them. I mean, it used to take a constitutional amendment to make something illegal but now we have tons of agencies responsible for regulating all the things.

        Plus, they're relying on the "math is a weapon" law to ban "export" of the models.

        • delichon 1 hour ago
          I don't like it one bit, but Congress passed the Arms Export Control Act (22 USC 2778) in the Ford administration and it has been applied to software since at least the Clinton administration.
          • conartist6 1 hour ago
            isn't this materially different in that it creates a kind of class system within the US?
        • skywhopper 1 hour ago
          It has never taken a constitutional amendment to make something illegal.
          • alpinisme 1 hour ago
            Prohibition was the 18th amendment
          • onionisafruit 1 hour ago
            slavery required the 13th amendment
      • jiggawatts 1 hour ago
        "Malboro cigarettes may once again be sold, but Newport remains banned for everyone except large purchasers that have paid the appropriate bri... fees."
      • verelo 1 hour ago
        None of those things are knowledge. I think theres something specific around limiting access to knowledge and capabilities that makes this feel insidious.
    • az226 39 minutes ago
      And even if a court places an injunction on the ban, it's possible Anthropic will still choose to keep it unavailable.
    • motbus3 1 hour ago
      I wonder what kind of emergency will happen when real elections get around
    • actionfromafar 56 minutes ago
      Overturning the Chevron doctrine is good because it stops lawful people from doing things we don't like. We aren't bound by laws, so we can do whatever we want.

      -- GOP probably

    • tiahura 1 hour ago
      They did. Defense Production Act (50 U.S.C. § 4511 );Export Control Reform Act, 50 U.S.C. § 4812 are just two of them.
      • naturalmovement 32 minutes ago
        Sad but not surprising the one comment providing real substantive facts is being downvoted into the grey and buried under mountains of sperging TDS.

        To wit:

        > The Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) is a U.S. federal law that authorizes the President to control exports for national security and foreign policy purposes, replacing the previous Export Administration Act of 1979.

        Passed with nearly unanimous support of both houses of Congress and signed into law.

    • tchalla 1 hour ago
      Do you remember the export controls on Covid vaccine material during the height of coronavirus? I do
  • andrewchambers 1 hour ago
    This seems like it will have pretty huge negative affects on startups needing to compete with 'trusted partners'
    • A_D_E_P_T 1 hour ago
      Startups don't have as much money to spend on lobbying and gifts, though.
      • slashdave 50 minutes ago
        Well... there are crypto startups, and perhaps a generous definition of "money"
      • ares623 1 hour ago
        Will startups be even a thing now that the VCs obviously just need to funnel all their money to 2 or so companies ad-infinitum for guaranteed returns.
        • airstrike 59 minutes ago
          The single most important question to be discussed on this website right now.
          • redcheeks 44 minutes ago
            Whatever happened to those network states? It's starting to look like it's them, UAE or Singapore
    • andy99 57 minutes ago
      Other than maybe some in-the-moment cybersec wrappers, is this really true? Does anyone think a startup with a good product is going to be materially disadvantaged by not having access to an incrementally better security focused LLM release? It’s lots of fun to pretend it’s some step-change that’s too dangerous for general release, but in real life it’s not conferring some massive advantage that any real startup would need to compete. Almost everyone would be best just to ignore it and keep building.

      (Just to be clear, I think the gatekeeping is ridiculous, especially given the above)

      • afavour 38 minutes ago
        That kind of gets to the absurdity of it. Either it’s a wildly powerful next generation model with incredible capabilities and thus needs to be limited… or it’s another progressive enhancement like we’ve seen already and limiting access to it makes no sense.
        • paytonjjones 19 minutes ago
          I don't think that follows.

          Say you had a perfectly smooth progressive chain from rocks to spears to guns to nuclear weapons. When it comes to government restrictions, you still have to choose to draw lines somewhere, right?

        • ares623 23 minutes ago
          The enemy is both all-powerful and pathetic, at the same time, all the time.
      • xorgun 53 minutes ago
        [dead]
      • redcheeks 55 minutes ago
        [flagged]
  • mlinsey 58 minutes ago
    I understand why Anthropic might not want to fight this particular one in court, because they're trying to convince the administration to let them move forward.

    But would another company who is not on the trusted partner list and has less to lose taking on the admin have standing to sue here? On the basis of the export control being illegal and this putting their business at a disadvantage vs. competitors with access

    • intrasight 28 minutes ago
      They could just ignore Trump as he has no authority to so limit a private company.
      • mlinsey 10 minutes ago
        The labs will not just ignore the order, there are too many other levers they can try to pull to mess with those companies. Just for some examples, think about the number of employees reliant on visas that could be revoked, the government contracts that the hyperscalers hosting them that could be canceled, the certifications that all the data centers need to be hooked up to the grid, the tariffs that could be put on critical components, the IPOs that need to be approved by regulators, the bill introduced in Congress to seize 50% of their equity...

        Lots of these moves would and should be struck down in court as an arbitrary and capricious use of administrative power. Some of them might not be, and in the meantime you're signing up for tons of trouble. A trillion-dollar company does not simply go to war with the US government.

        A more mid-sized company that's not so intertwined, but not so small that they can't get a good legal team, might be another story.

  • alanwreath 35 minutes ago
    I’m not sure what the US government is trying to do. At first it seems like they are just trying to stifle some company that said no. Now they are just doing free publicity. It’s like never before have I wanted to try something out as much as this.

    They’re in effect saying “nothing else is as powerful as what Anthropic put out”. Even though that might not really be the case it’s what it sounds like.

    • drcode 20 minutes ago
      they're flailing is what they're doing
  • Hawkenfall 1 hour ago
    This appears to be only for Mythos 5 access, NOT Fable 5.
    • irthomasthomas 1 hour ago
      So only 100 companies have exclusive access to frontier AI.
    • sourthyme 1 hour ago
      Aren't these the same models?
      • qsxfthnkp2322 1 hour ago
        Fable was available to me as a normal person using Claude.ai

        Mythos never was and I don’t think that’s changing.

        • ryan_n 28 minutes ago
          Until the chinese make a comparable open source model at some point
          • iAMkenough 7 minutes ago
            I’d say we’re about 5 years out from the Great Firewall of America, and requiring government ID associated with serial number to legally purchase components.

            America will do that before gun control.

      • aesthesia 1 hour ago
        Under the hood, yes, but Mythos had more relaxed safeguards and was/is only available to a subset of approved customers under Project Glasswing, similar to the situation with GPT-5.6 now.
      • paxys 1 hour ago
        Mythos doesn't have the strict safeguards of Fable and is only accessible by a very small number of pre-approved companies.
  • avaer 24 minutes ago
    I wonder if the Founding Fathers knew about AI, they would include it in the 2nd?

    The spirit is to provide effective tools for the people to resist federal military tyranny, and Mythos seems like it would be a good tool to defend against that, for so many reasons.

  • truthbe 21 minutes ago
    Open source should create a new license where it specifically doesn't allow release to these "trusted partners".
  • SwellJoe 1 hour ago
    "I have determined that appropriate safeguards are in place to permit certain trusted partners to access the Claude Mythos 5 Model"

    I assume "trusted partners" means, "companies that have bribed Trump an appropriate amount". A few million for the inauguration, a few million for the ballroom, a few million on a movie about Melania, the don wants a taste.

  • olalonde 57 minutes ago
    It feels the U.S. is moving closer to a textbook definition of crony capitalism. Really sad but unsurprising with the current administration.
  • Alien1Being 13 minutes ago
    Don't start to rely on it .

    The US might remove access next month in a fit of pique.

    The Chinese models look increasingly more reliable and safer.

  • __natty__ 1 hour ago
    And we get the news the same time OpenAI releases 5.6. What a coincidence?
    • mrandish 1 hour ago
      I think they kind of had to since they allowed OpenAI to do a 5.6 "preview to trusted parties" today. The other driver is that the DoD/NSA wanted to get access to Mythos again. I figure OAI will now do several weeks of 'preview' like Anthropic did with Mythos. When OAI wants to release 5.6 wider to actually start making money with it, I expect Fable will get approved the same day.

      Back when the administration hit Mythos/Fable with the surprise ban, I figured this would be the endgame. They'd keep Anthropic tied up until a competitor had a roughly comparable model ready, then gate them the same.

    • xorgun 51 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • kdawag 32 minutes ago
    To the surprise of absolutely nobody following the news
  • outside1234 1 hour ago
    Is there a list of the partners that get access? That should be public, right?
  • naturalmovement 22 minutes ago
    80% of the irrationally angry comments here have zero clue how export controls work and is giving me serious Dunning Kruger vibes.

    Please go read US history before sounding off on this topic. These laws have existed for decades.

    • gensym 15 minutes ago
      Just because a policy is legal doesn't mean it cannot be disastrous.
  • sscaryterry 1 hour ago
    I thought Fable was a "safer" Mythos?!
    • dchftcs 1 hour ago
      I suppose the point is that Mythos was released to a smaller set of partners anyway and Fable is for the masses.
  • standardUser 26 minutes ago
    Meanwhile, China is pushing the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO), which, in the face of internal divisions and impotent leadership among Western nations, could prove to be the first global regime that China gets to build and lead.
  • Havoc 25 minutes ago
    One more aspect where the US can no longer be counted on.

    Let's hope this creates a bit more fire under the asses of other countries

  • Henchman21 1 hour ago
    This is what “stacking the deck” looks like
  • nozzlegear 1 hour ago
    Wowee, just happens to be on the same day of OpenAI's Sol announcement. How convenient for Dario and Anthropic!
    • __natty__ 1 hour ago
      That’s exactly what I was thinking. Feels like someone is playing a high-stakes game, putting on a show involving the US government.
      • Aeolun 57 minutes ago
        This should perhaps not be surprising considering the president.
  • jimmydoe 59 minutes ago
    Congrats sama. Such a great sophisticated 5d chess move.
    • llelouch 30 minutes ago
      Please explain. Do you think Altman wanted this to catch-up?
  • pertymcpert 1 hour ago
    Why would they allow Mythos but not Fable? Fable is the one with more guardrails.
    • layer8 1 hour ago
      They only allow it for specific companies and agencies, which are trusted with the less restricted model. The general public is still not trusted to use Fable, apparently.
    • nozzlegear 1 hour ago
      To quote famed businessman and philosopher Eugene Krabs: "Money."
  • aryonoco 1 hour ago
    Land of the free, land of the brave. Free market. Freedom of speech. Market economy.

    These words don’t mean what they use to anymore. Newspeak is in full swing. Words still sound the same and are written in the same way but now mean something completely different. If Mao and Stalin were alive, they would be nodding approvingly.

    • wasting_time 1 hour ago
      Free for me, not for thee!

      I hope the Chinese models catch up soon so I can stop contributing to the American economy.

  • jauntywundrkind 2 hours ago
    * to some US companies.

    Asterisk the size of a Mac truck.

    Also this administration having say over who gets access to what AI is just so much more grift corruption and picking your favorites / destroying others, for these incdecent undemocratic in American grifters who've seized our state.

    • wolvoleo 1 hour ago
      If this is the way things are now, isn't that going to crash the AI stocks? All those trillions dumped into it probably weren't with the expectation that it could only be sold to a handful of select US agencies and corporations.
      • thrwaway55 1 hour ago
        They are all private aren't they? There's nothing to crash since the valuations were all made up funny raise numbers anyway. A donation to the right person likely removes the restrictions
      • bayarearefugee 1 hour ago
        > If this is the way things are now, isn't that going to crash the AI stocks?

        Maybe, maybe not. Tech stocks are mostly vibes-based now, reality isn't really a concern for them.

  • zuzululu 1 hour ago
    should see 5.6 any day now
  • tristanj 2 hours ago
  • frogperson 1 hour ago
    Who needs freedom of speech anyway? I'm just glad the trump admin is looking out for by best interests. /s
    • vlian2088 12 minutes ago
      >Who needs freedom of speech anyway?

      I vividly recall that freedom of speech is racist now, so good riddance.

    • truthbe 52 minutes ago
      Sarcasm Detected, -40 Ameripoints have been deducted from your account. Have a nice day!
  • paxys 1 hour ago
    TL;DR - OpenAI and Anthropic are both allowed to ship their most powerful models to a small number of companies pre-approved by Trump.
  • skywhopper 1 hour ago
    Why post a content free link to Twitter for this?