Show HN: Hallucinopedia

(halupedia.com)

49 points | by bstrama 1 hour ago

20 comments

  • driggs 23 minutes ago
    This is fantastic. I couldn't find any obvious way to search for a new page, but you can simply bang out any arbitrary URL slug and the new article will be hallucinated fresh, eg:

    https://halupedia.com/shortest-cave-in-the-world

    https://halupedia.com/echolocation-ability-in-spiders

    • bstrama 20 minutes ago
      Exactly, but I consider adding fake search that could find you ANY article, including not existent ones
      • mmooss 13 minutes ago
        Yes, that would be the perfect touch. This is brilliant satire. We need more satire!
  • diputsmonro 38 minutes ago
    It's pretty fun to poke at! Although it's certainly difficult to be exact, it would be neat if generated pages used the context of the pages they were linked from (ideally, all pages that link to it) to guide the direction of the page. From the ones I generated it seemed they were mostly independent.
    • bstrama 35 minutes ago
      Yeah, thought about that, maybe will implement it. Will keep in mind! For now SSR to feed LLMs' the priority
  • bstrama 2 minutes ago
    UPDATE: Just now, comment section added. Have a nice time arguing!
  • lxgr 55 minutes ago
    Ironically, this seems much faster (for pages already, erm, "researched") than the real one! How?
    • bstrama 43 minutes ago
      It generates articles only once. So once it's generated, it never perish. Logic looks like: If article exist -> show it If not -> generate and save
      • lxgr 28 minutes ago
        I get that, but how does it serve the generated and cached ones seemingly faster than Wikipedia? (My guess is that single-page applications, which this one seems to be, just need less round trips between navigations or something?)
        • bstrama 22 minutes ago
          Yep, just a react. Also we use gemini 2.5 flash lite, so it's fast, cheap and dumb.
  • JohnMakin 1 hour ago
    Funny, but you could argue this is actively harmful to the web.
    • anonymousiam 13 minutes ago
      It's probably only harmful to the AI scrapers that train from the web. Most people will understand the purpose of this -- to poison LLM training in a humorous way, which is really easy to do. It exemplifies a major weakness in modern day AI.
    • isoprophlex 1 hour ago
      The sooner the current web dies, the better. Something better either rises from its ashes, or we lose... something that was already lost.
      • b00ty4breakfast 31 minutes ago
        or something way worse shows up.
        • JohnMakin 25 minutes ago
          Yea, I'm not sure how the "this is really bad so let's make it worse" argument really makes any sense
          • znort_ 16 minutes ago
            context. sometimes things simply have to be broken to give way for something better. ymmv.
    • r3trohack3r 30 minutes ago
      Interesting, but you could argue comments like this are actively harmful to the web.
      • AlecSchueler 25 minutes ago
        But the argument wouldn't be nearly as strong.
    • dayofthedaleks 56 minutes ago
      You could also argue that the web has failed and poisoning it into irrelevance is a vital service, motivating humans to collect knowledge into immutable sources. We‘ll call them ‘libraries.’
    • lxgr 54 minutes ago
      On the other hand, one could argue that anything that can be destroyed by relatively clearly labeled satire, deserves to be.
    • stronglikedan 59 minutes ago
      > you could argue

      Could you? I don't see it happening, but I could be wrong.

    • parliament32 39 minutes ago
      To the web? It's fantastic for the web, these are the kinds of fun projects that make the web a worthwhile place to be. To slop generators? Yes, absolutely harmful, and that's for the best.
    • slig 45 minutes ago
      Grokipedia is already doing that.
    • Jtarii 52 minutes ago
      Pissing on a pile of shit
  • petercooper 1 hour ago
    Give it a week and see what Google AI Overview has to say about the Great Pigeon Census of 1887!
  • driggs 12 minutes ago
    This site is going to be expensive when a web crawler hits it. A honey pot that burns tokens.
  • solarkraft 57 minutes ago
    Finally a more trustworthy version of Grokipedia!
    • bstrama 56 minutes ago
      It's hilarious, you made my day hahah
    • LeoPanthera 49 minutes ago
      I honestly forgot that Grokipedia existed. Did anyone ever use it?
      • bstrama 42 minutes ago
        Tried once, but was useless. Very funny that it had so many text, while Elon is apparently "huge" fan of short and precise communication...
      • mmooss 16 minutes ago
        Somebody showed me it appearing near the top of some of their DuckDuckGo queries.
  • janwillemb 31 minutes ago
    It's nice, but after a few clicks my LLM content fatigue kicks in.
  • gavmor 16 minutes ago
    Hm, the page generated seems inconsistent with the usage of the original link.
  • bstrama 1 hour ago
    Can't wait to see the next generation of LLMs after feeding it all of that hahaha
    • everyos_ 1 hour ago
      The page requires JS to load its content - user agents without JS support just get a blank page.

      I'm not sure if the bots that scrape data to train LLMs are capable of loading that type of page, or if they only work on pages that have the content inside the HTML itself?

      • replygirl 1 hour ago
        any serious scraping service these days will fail over to a headless browser when it fetches an asset referencing a js bundle that isn't verifiably a vendor script
      • m3047 44 minutes ago
        It's entirely possible they simply ingest the JS as-is.
      • bstrama 57 minutes ago
        I'm aware and will implement SSR soon ;)
  • nickvec 59 minutes ago
    Seeing “Something broke, which is ironic for a made-up encyclopedia: Load failed” when trying to access some of the suggested starting points
    • bstrama 57 minutes ago
      Works on my PC.

      Could you gimme the url that's failing?

  • meghneelgore 43 minutes ago
    Great idea! I created an adjacent website that gives, shall we say, "alternative facts" about your questions. (don't know if the rules allow me to link the site so I won't).
  • jijilao 17 minutes ago
    wtf, I thought these were just anecdotes until I saw they were actually happening in Astoria. I used to visit in the summers and never heard about any of that! Stop the fake news
    • tukunjil 10 minutes ago
      All the world are going mad with artificial intelligence and LLMs. Just disgusting!
  • throw310822 19 minutes ago
    Funny. Small improvement suggestion: the entry about "Glorbonian culinary arts" links to "the subterranean nation of Glorbonia". However upon clicking the link to "Glorbonia", an entry is generated claiming that "Glorbonia refers to a peculiar and largely uncatalogued form of sub-auditory resonance". It would be cool if some context were carried over from the referrer page so that there is some coherence between entries (ah, and some existing entries could be taken in account when generating new ones).
  • dmje 58 minutes ago
    I LOVE IT. Superb.
  • arduanika 40 minutes ago
    Love it! It feels very Borges!

    Feature request: also be able to click on the Talk page to see the controversies. I don't always want to trust the article itself as the final word.

    Edit: Oh look, there's an article about the YC! https://halupedia.com/y-combinator

  • FergusArgyll 40 minutes ago
    Who says llms can't be funny?!
  • yodon 20 minutes ago
    [flagged]