10 comments

  • colanderman 1 hour ago
    There is in fact no photograph of treetops glowing.

    There is a digital UV-wavelength video of the corona, and a visible-wavelength video of the trees.

    The paper [1] contains a sole picture with tiny circles indicating where the UV-video detected corona events, overlaid over a frame of the visible-wavelength video.

    The paper does also contain a video [2] which overlays a somewhat processed version of the UV video over the visible wavelength video, where UV photon events are indicated by decaying red dots.

    [1] https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL11...

    [2] https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSuppl...

    • addaon 39 minutes ago
      Sorry, in what way is this not a photograph? Are you saying that a video is not a sequence of photographs, that UV photons captured by a sensor don’t count because human retina sensitivity is low in that range, or some hopefully-less-semantic argument?
      • adammarples 5 minutes ago
        Maybe they take issue with the word "glowing", which doesn't usually refer to invisible electromagnetic radiation
    • aaron695 49 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • mlhpdx 1 hour ago
    Having lived in the PNW all my life, and worked closely with our friend Doug (the fir trees), this article brings up old mental images of otherwise healthy needles with browned (dead) tips in the crowns.

    Coincidence? Probably.

    Very cool phenomenon to catch visually.

    • t-3 28 minutes ago
      Maybe not a coincidence! The previous research linked in the article mentions this in lab testing:

      https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022JD03...

        > Visually, the corona discharges generated on the leaves were either small purple-blue point discharges or elongated purple-blue discharges, and usually formed on the tips of the leaf closest to the source of the electric field (Figure 1). Sometimes the corona discharges were steady and constant, but other times they would dim and brighten in an unsteady pulse. When the corona was turned off, the tips of the leaf where the discharges occurred were often burned and browned, even for the weakest electric fields applied to the leaves.
    • colanderman 1 hour ago
      Despite the title, it was not in fact caught visually.
      • arrowleaf 33 minutes ago
        Human eyes can be sensitive down to 380nm, the UV range goes up to 400nm. Birds and insects can see this. We can see this, using UV filters such as shown in the article. I get that it's fun to be a pedant sometimes, but come on.
  • ortusdux 19 minutes ago
    It would be amazing if there was an electrical mechanism behind crown shyness.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_shyness

  • Lalabadie 1 hour ago
    Great time to read about St Elmo's Fire!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Elmo's_fire

    • _joel 42 minutes ago
      Sounds like a man in motion :)
  • calibas 53 minutes ago
    I notice the article, the paper, and the "plain language" summary of the paper don't mention the common term for this phenomenon, St Elmo's fire.
  • dreamlayers 25 minutes ago
    What is new here? I thought corona discharges during storms had already been well known for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Elmo%27s_fire
    • none2585 12 minutes ago
      Article claims it had never been seen outside the lab before (for trees specifically I guess)
  • imzadi 29 minutes ago
    I've seen these images before, or some very similar images. So this is based on old photos or it has indeed been done before.
  • brador 5 minutes ago
    Will head hair on humans do this too?
  • wildylion 57 minutes ago
    Storm troopers, but not the kind you'd expect.
  • GolfPopper 8 minutes ago
    [dead]