18 comments

  • rvermeulen98 5 hours ago
    I've been working on a LAN discovery tool with a Terminal User Interface (TUI) written entirely in Go. It's called Whosthere, and it's designed to help you explore devices on your local network without requiring elevated privileges.

    It works by combining several discovery methods:

    - mDNS and SSDP scanning

    - ARP cache reading (after triggering ARP resolution via TCP/UDP sweeps)

    - OUI lookups to identify device manufacturers

    It also includes:

    - A fast, keyboard-driven TUI (powered by tview)

    - An optional built-in port scanner

    - Daemon mode with a simple HTTP API to fetch devices

    - Configurable theming and behavior via a YAML config file

    Why I built it:

    Mainly to learn, I've been programming in Go for about a year now and wanted to combine learning Go with learning more about networking in one single project. I've always been a big fan of TUI applications like lazygit, k9s, and dive. And then the idea came to build a TUI application that shows devices on your LAN. I am by no means a networking expert, but it was fun to figure out how ARP works, and discovery protocols such as mDNS and SSDP.

    Example usage:

    ---

    # install via HomeBrew brew tap ramonvermeulen/whosthere brew install whosthere

    # or with go install go install github.com/ramonvermeulen/whosthere@latest

    # run as TUI whosthere

    # run as daemon whosthere daemon --port 8080

    ---

    I'd love to hear your feedback, if you have ideas for additional features or improvements that is highly appreciated! Current platform support is Linux and MacOS.

    • alphax314 23 minutes ago
      Looks great!! I had the same idea a few days ago and am so glad you posted this now! I will be using it and will let you know of any feedback. So far works great on my network!
    • genericacct 51 minutes ago
      Installed on raspbian, works wonders, much better than the thing i vibecoded yesterday. One feature I'd like: recording new arrivals to a log with all the info so it can be used as a barebones IDS
    • N3802E 32 minutes ago
      This looks great! I've been searching for something like this for ever.

      Some feedback of what I found on my network, as compared to some other scanners I've used.

      I've never seen anything that can beat Advanced IP Scanner at finding hostnames. I've never even found a way to get arp or nmap to get close to Advanced IP Scanner; I've tried dozens of suggested commands of each, all with no luck. Here's the results of my scans:

      Alive hosts: 309

      Unkown: 201

      With hostnames: 80

      https://www.advanced-ip-scanner.com/

      ####################################

      I also tried a program called Angry IP Scanner:

      Hosts scanned: 510

      Hosts alive: 315

      With hostnames: 75

      https://angryip.org/

      ####################################

      whosthere

      Devices: 318

      With hostnames: 54

    • nickcw 1 hour ago
      Very nice tool :-)

      It would be great it it could show the reverse lookup of the IPs as on my LAN everything has a name and if it hasn't then it is probably an interloper!

  • vzaliva 15 minutes ago
    I am not a golang user. If I install as recommended via `go` command on Linux how do I make sure it is updated when new versions are released? I wish it has a .deb package..
    • zahlman 12 minutes ago
      > I wish it has a .deb package..

      Generally speaking, the Debian package management system is really not a place I would look for prompt updates when new versions of software are released.

  • apitman 11 minutes ago
    Have you tried it on Tailscale at all? Could be super useful but sadly TS doesn't support mDNS: https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/1013
  • zahlman 14 minutes ago
    Does the Go standard library have unusually good TUI support or something? Am I just imagining the pattern of new TUIs being written in Go?
    • pstuart 4 minutes ago
      No, it really doesn't have anything TUI focused in stdlib. I get the reason why but it would be cool if they had something foundational in golang.org/x/

      This project appears to be using github.com/rivo/tview which is is really solid.

    • jen20 4 minutes ago
      The standard library doesn't have much for this, but Bubble Tea https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea is behind many of the better Go TUIs. This one is using https://github.com/rivo/tview.
      • pstuart 2 minutes ago
        The charmbracelet folk are quite, um, charming, but when I tried to work with bubble tea on a multi pane project I found it unwieldy -- tview seemed much more straightforward.
  • jasonjmcghee 4 minutes ago
    Big missed opportunity to call it “Whose LAN is it anyway?”
  • GeoffKnauth 33 minutes ago
    Using brew, I got "Apple could not verify `whosthere' is free of malware that may harm your Mac or compromise your privacy." [Move to Trash] [Done]
    • cedws 24 minutes ago
      It just means that the binary is not notarised. You can go into Privacy & Security to override.
  • mrcaramelpants 2 hours ago
    Surely a missed opportunity to name it “whogoesthere”
  • Evidlo 33 minutes ago
    I'm also working on a Go TUI tool. Any reason you went with tcell instead of charmbracelet ecosystem?
    • rvermeulen98 23 minutes ago
      I started off using tview/tcell, and only later found out about bubbletea and the charmbracelet ecosystem. Then I didn't really find a solid reason to switch over to bubbletea. So far I really enjoyed the experience building the app with tview, the only real limitation I ran into was switching the theme at runtime, for which I had to build a custom mechanism.
  • 84634E1A607A 2 hours ago
    Overall good work. I'd request an `-i` command-line parameter to specify the interface to scan (and I'd prefer ALL params being able to be read from command line params). I think it just performs a full scan initially on my laptop, following scans either didn't success or didn't involve TCP connect scan (I don't see ARP requests after the initial scan).
    • rvermeulen98 2 hours ago
      That's correct. To avoid overloading the local network, the initial scan has a built-in safeguard:

      1. It only scans the subnet of the configured network interface.

      2. The scan is limited to a maximum size of a /16 subnet.

      3. It runs just once every 5 minutes (this interval should be made configurable, currently still hardcoded).

      If a subnet larger than /16 is configured, whosthere will log a warning and only scan the first /16 portion of that subnet. As of now the network interface itself is configured via the YAML file. I agree it would be a good idea to add command-line flags for more of these settings to make them easier to adjust.

  • Havoc 1 hour ago
    Busy building something similar with a view towards customising it for my LAN.

    Specifically it needs to pull additional detail out of proxmox servers and opnsense plus deduce where things are physically based on latency.

    Thats a whole lot easier if it doesn’t need to work universally & you can hardcode some assumptions

  • kapitanjakc 2 hours ago
    Good stuff, this saves me the trouble of going through router GUI. And remembering if it was 192.168.1.1 or 0.1 or what were the admin/root passwords.
  • est 1 hour ago
    I hope browsers could support mDNS or SSDP. We need an Intranet browser!
  • petcat 2 hours ago
    I love the resurgence of TUI apps, but I wonder what the definition of "modern TUI" means in these cases. Does it basically mean just not using curses?
    • Daviey 2 hours ago
      It means it has a dependency on X11.

        $ go install github.com/ramonvermeulen/whosthere@latest
        # golang.design/x/clipboard
        clipboard_linux.c:14:10: fatal error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
          14 | #include <X11/Xlib.h>
             |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
        compilation terminated.
      • sigmonsays 19 minutes ago
        this stopped me from go installing it too on nixos. I'm not gonna put the effort in to run it.

        There should be a build tag to disable clipboard, that'd be the easiest way around this.

      • petcat 1 hour ago
        Yikes, so it's a "TUI" app... that still requires a display server? So I can't run this TUI over SSH or a virtual terminal. Wondering what the point of a tui is that still requires a gui environment to run?
        • Daviey 1 hour ago
          Sorry, I was unhelpfully flippant. You totally can, and I don't want to distract from the great app that has been shared. This bug was just a compile time issue, which needed X libs to bake in clipboard support which is optional at runtime.
      • fellerts 2 hours ago
        That has nothing to do with the UI framework. The X11 dependency comes as part of the clipboard integration (which I'd argue should be optional or even removed). Still, I wouldn't call it modern if Wayland is outright not supported.
        • rvermeulen98 2 hours ago
          I think this is only a problem when building from source, right? It is indeed because of the dependency on https://github.com/golang-design/clipboard.

          I hesitated a bit bringing in this feature. On one hand, I really like to have clipboard support, on the other hand, I don't like that it requires you to change from static to dynamic linking (and have the x11 dependency).

          Maybe I could write an install.sh script for installation that detects the OS and fetches the correct version/tarball from the Github release.

          • Daviey 2 hours ago
            That library isn't going to support Wayland any time soon, and requiring CGO isn't ideal IMO. See this bug, https://github.com/golang-design/clipboard/issues/6

            How about this PR? https://github.com/ramonvermeulen/whosthere/pull/29

            It switches to using github.com/dece2183/go-clipboard, which supports Mac, Windows, Linux (X11 + Wayland) and Android.

            • rvermeulen98 1 hour ago
              Thanks a lot for your contribution, this is something I will look into in the upcoming days. I totally agree that CGO isn't ideal, I had to make the build/release process also a lot more complicated purely for that clipboard requirement (see GHAs and the different goreleaser files).

              On the other hand, I also don't want whosthere to be depended on a fork that isn't maintained anymore. I will think about this trade-off, but I am also interested how others look at this problem.

        • ok123456 1 hour ago
          What's modern about Wayland?
  • Anonbrit 3 hours ago
    It says 'Open ports: (None)' for all devices on my network, despite there being open ports on many of them (MacOS Tahoe 26.2 / installed via go)
    • rvermeulen98 2 hours ago
      It doesn't start port scanning by default, maybe this is a feature I can build in the future. When you are on the `detail` view of a device, you can press `p` and that will open a pop-up to perform the port scan. Also the list of ports that will be scanned is a default list of common ports, and can be configured via the configuration yaml.
  • girishso 2 hours ago
    Great tool, only thing I miss is it doesn't show SAMBA names.
  • coolius 3 hours ago
    this is great! i had to tweak the config file on macos because it was using some weird interface (utun4) instead of en0. otherwise awesome tool, i am definitely going to be using this more often.
    • rvermeulen98 2 hours ago
      Thanks, I am glad you like it! I couldn't find a Go API that just returns the OS "default" network interface, so struggled a bit with a correct implementation for that part.

      When reading some blog posts, I found often a solution where it sends out an UDP dial to for example 8.8.8.8:53 because you can then get the network interface back from the connection it's local address. As fallback I implemented to pick the first non-loopback interface that is up.

      Would be open to suggestions to do this in a better way!

      • fellerts 2 hours ago
        I think this package does exactly what you need: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/google/gopacket/routing. Works on my machine (error handling left to the reader)

            router, _ := routing.New()
            iface, _, _, _ := router.Route(net.ParseIP("8.8.8.8"))
            fmt.Println(iface.Name)
        
        this prints my Ethernet interface as expected. It doesn't make any requests, it just figures out where to route a packet. I guess it interfaces with the OS routing table.
        • rvermeulen98 1 hour ago
          Thanks for sharing! This is definitely something I will look into, I am all in favor to simplify the current implementation of finding the "default" OS network interface.
  • hk1337 1 hour ago
    > Apple could not verify “whosthere” is free of malware that may harm your Mac or compromise your privacy.

    Couldn't run it on macOS Tahoe. I believe this requires me lowering the security to allow it, which is something I would rather not doing.

    • rawgreaze 1 hour ago
      This is basically how every custom app works on Mac. You have to go to Settings -> Security & Privacy and click "Allow whosthere"
      • rvermeulen98 1 hour ago
        Would it help to get it on the "official" homebrew, instead of a custom tap/cask? Might try to do an application for that somewhere in the upcoming weeks.
    • phubbard 29 minutes ago
      this can be fixed by

      xattr -c `which whosthere`