1,700 year old egg never broke

(atlasobscura.com)

95 points | by demadog 4 days ago

11 comments

  • fifilura 1 day ago
    I guess they are scientists and know better than me, but my bet is that is will just contain sludge.

    Egg shells are more organic than you expect.

    This is why you use stuff like waterglass https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_silicate to seal them.

    • mulmen 1 day ago
      > Egg shells are more organic than you expect.

      I expect them to be completely organic. What else would they be?

      • parl_match 15 hours ago
        namespace collision: to the layperson, it's organic because it came from an organism. from a chemical perspective, it's considered non-organic

        i admit i read ops comment and was confused for a second until it clicked. they're mostly calcium carbonate

        • mulmen 10 hours ago
          I wondered about that but then in context wasn’t sure of the relevance. I’m aware that even fresh eggs are somewhat porous and wouldn’t expect the contents to last beyond a week before beginning to break down.
      • fifilura 1 day ago
        Mostly calcium carbonate.
      • foxyv 14 hours ago
        Calcium carbonate. So a salt I guess?
  • nyanpasu64 1 day ago
    The eggshell looks like a century egg, but as mentioned by the comment the contents may have decomposed if the mud wasn't alkaline like the century egg production process.
    • phinnaeus 10 hours ago
      It’s a 17 century egg, to be precise
  • mseepgood 1 day ago
    Of course they are going to break it.
  • shrx 1 day ago
    I wonder why they don't put it in a CT scanner first before breaking it.
    • shrx 21 hours ago
      Apologies, apparently I missed this part in the article since the large ad banner immediately next to it distracted me.
      • coldpie 18 hours ago
        Install an ad blocker, friend!
        • efilife 16 hours ago
          ublock origin to be specific
    • Cyphase 23 hours ago
      > A Micro CT scan showed that this ancient egg is still full of liquid.

      > “Researchers are planning to carefully extract the liquid to better study it,” stated Edward Biddulph, Senior Project Manager, who oversaw the site excavation. “It’s a controlled process similar to egg blowing, where a tiny hole is made in its shell after creating a 3D model.”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_microtomography

      • metalman 17 hours ago
        I think it is a mistake not to cut the top off the egg and just look inside as ancient egg shell has no value after it drys out and the visual information may be unique,so off with its top, and then take samples of the "liquid" and the inner shell lining, if it's present, and then see if there is any remaining structure of an embryo or the egg as laid.
  • fsckboy 1 day ago
    >Scientists are eager to use DNA testing to establish the species that laid the egg

    how much DNA is in an egg, isn't it just a single cell with a single nucleus? and if unfertilized is haploid?

    • fbn79 1 day ago
      In addition to the single nucleus the egg can contains trace of DNA from the mother
  • ars 1 day ago
    I think they should not pierce it, but instead leave it for future humans to study.
    • teruakohatu 21 hours ago
      Science funding requires doing something. Nobody funds you to not do something.

      Regardless of getting funding, I don't see why our level of technology is not adequate to study an egg.

    • yumraj 11 hours ago
      Depending on how you look at it, the ones studying it are future humans.
    • timschmidt 1 day ago
      Forbidden breakfast!
    • creatonez 8 hours ago
      Don't worry, I'll find another one
  • robofanatic 20 hours ago
    Story of an egg that never hatched.
  • anshumankmr 1 day ago
    I dare them to make an omelette wit that.
    • a3w 1 day ago
      Can't make science without breaking an egg!
    • foreigner 22 hours ago
      Fry it up with bog butter!
  • knighthack 18 hours ago
    I'm willing to bet there's a dragon in that egg.
  • kubb 1 day ago
    [flagged]
    • speerer 1 day ago
      What's your definition of a scientist?

      I wonder if many of history's greatest scientists might fail to meet it.

    • viciousvoxel 20 hours ago
      This is actually my wife's job/area of research, except typically they use the eggshell proteins to determine taxonomy. It's extremely rare that DNA survives in these types of samples but the proteins are preserved in the eggshell's mineral matrix.
    • jessekv 23 hours ago
      "Scientist" is cool, but personally I would call myself a "forensic archeologist" if I had this gig.
      • viciousvoxel 20 hours ago
        It's usually just called archaeology or perhaps biomolecular archaeology. Forensic archaeology is a bit different, and it usually pertains to humans and their crimes.
  • slow123_ 1 day ago
    duke dennis must’ve saved the egg for breakfast but forgot about it loll